» Articles » PMID: 37645181

Wild Snapdragon Plant Pedigree Sheds Light on Limited Connectivity Enhanced by Higher Migrant Reproductive Success in a Fragmented Landscape

Overview
Journal Open Res Eur
Date 2023 Aug 30
PMID 37645181
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In contrast with historical knowledge, a recent view posits that a non-negligible proportion of populations thrive in a fragmented landscape. One underlying mechanism is the maintenance of functional connectivity, i.e., the net flow of individuals or their genes moving among suitable habitat patches. Alternatively, functional connectivity might be typically limited but enhanced by a higher reproductive success of migrants. We tested for this hypothesis in wild snapdragon plants inhabiting six patches separated by seawater in a fragmented Mediterranean scrubland landscape. We reconstructed their pedigree by using a parentage assignment method based on microsatellite genetic markers. We then estimated functional connectivity and the reproductive success of plants resulting from between-patch dispersal events. We found that wild snapdragon plants thrived in this fragmented landscape, although functional connectivity between habitat patches was low (i.e. 2.9%). The progeny resulting from between-patch dispersal events had a higher reproductive success than residents. Our findings imply that low functional connectivity in a fragmented landscapes may have been enhanced by higher reproductive success after migration. This original mechanisms might be partly compensating the negative impact of fragmentation.

Citing Articles

Wild snapdragon plant pedigree sheds light on limited connectivity enhanced by higher migrant reproductive success in a fragmented landscape.

Gervais L, Mouginot P, Gibert A, Salles O, Latutrie M, Piquet J Open Res Eur. 2023; 1:145.

PMID: 37645181 PMC: 10446054. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.14281.2.

References
1.
Riester M, Stadler P, Klemm K . Reconstruction of pedigrees in clonal plant populations. Theor Popul Biol. 2010; 78(2):109-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2010.05.002. View

2.
Cayuela H, Rougemont Q, Prunier J, Moore J, Clobert J, Besnard A . Demographic and genetic approaches to study dispersal in wild animal populations: A methodological review. Mol Ecol. 2018; 27(20):3976-4010. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14848. View

3.
Chapman R, Wang J, Bourke A . Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators. Mol Ecol. 2003; 12(10):2801-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01957.x. View

4.
Petkova D, Novembre J, Stephens M . Visualizing spatial population structure with estimated effective migration surfaces. Nat Genet. 2015; 48(1):94-100. PMC: 4696895. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3464. View

5.
Sebbenn A, Carvalho A, Freitas M, Moraes S, Gaino A, da Silva J . Low levels of realized seed and pollen gene flow and strong spatial genetic structure in a small, isolated and fragmented population of the tropical tree Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. Heredity (Edinb). 2010; 106(1):134-45. PMC: 3183851. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.33. View