» Articles » PMID: 37644466

Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump on In-hospital Outcomes and 1-year Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Aug 29
PMID 37644466
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The role of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still a subject of intense debate. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of IABP on the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: From the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV 2.2, 6017 AMI patients were subtracted, and 250 patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing PCI were analyzed. In-hospital outcomes (death, 24-hour urine volumes, length of ICU stays, and length of hospital stays) and 1-year mortality were compared between IABP and control during the hospital course and 12-month follow-up.

Results: An IABP was implanted in 30.8% (77/250) of patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock undergoing PCI. IABP patients had higher levels of Troponin T (3.94 [0.73-11.85] ng/ml vs. 1.99 [0.55-5.75] ng/ml, p-value = 0.02). IABP patients have a longer length of ICU and hospital stays (124 [63-212] hours vs. 83 [43-163] hours, p-value = 0.005; 250 [128-435] hours vs. 170 [86-294] hours, p-value = 0.009). IABP use was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality (33.8% vs. 33.0%, p-value = 0.90) and increased 24-hour urine volumes (2100 [1455-3208] ml vs. 1915 [1110-2815] ml, p-value = 0.25). In addition, 1-year mortality was not different between the IABP and the control group (48.1% vs. 48.0%; hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.54, p-value = 0.851).

Conclusion: IABP may be associated with longer ICU and hospital stays but not better short-and long-term clinical prognosis.

Citing Articles

A multivariate and retrospective analysis of the impact of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in Open-Heart surgery.

Sharma S, Nah J, Siddarth V, Lai H, Liang S, Ong Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29534.

PMID: 39604501 PMC: 11603185. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81056-z.


Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elsaeidy A, Mohamed Taha A, Abuelazm M, Soliman Y, Ali M, Alassiri A BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024; 24(1):362.

PMID: 39014315 PMC: 11251331. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-03917-9.

References
1.
Unverzagt S, Buerke M, de Waha A, Haerting J, Pietzner D, Seyfarth M . Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (3):CD007398. PMC: 8454261. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007398.pub3. View

2.
Karami M, Eriksen E, Ouweneel D, Claessen B, Vis M, Baan J . Long-term 5-year outcome of the randomized IMPRESS in severe shock trial: percutaneous mechanical circulatory support vs. intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021; 10(9):1009-1015. PMC: 8648392. DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab060. View

3.
Sloth E, Sprogoe P, Lindskov C, Horlyck A, Solvig J, Jakobsen C . Intra-aortic balloon pumping increases renal blood flow in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction. Perfusion. 2009; 23(4):223-6. DOI: 10.1177/0267659108100457. View

4.
Vallabhajosyula S, Verghese D, Henry T, Katz J, Nicholson W, A Jaber W . Contemporary Management of Concomitant Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022; 97(12):2333-2354. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.06.027. View

5.
Neumann F, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning A, Benedetto U . 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2018; 40(2):87-165. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. View