» Articles » PMID: 37644259

Anesthesia Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Spinal Diseases: a Single-center Case-series Study

Overview
Journal JA Clin Rep
Date 2023 Aug 29
PMID 37644259
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Neuraxial anesthesia is widely used as the most effective and standard method in obstetric anesthesia. However, there is a concern that neuraxial anesthesia may be technically difficult or ineffective in pregnant women with spinal disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the implementation rate of neuraxial anesthesia among pregnant women with spinal diseases and their success rate at our institution.

Methods: The subjects of this study were pregnant patients who delivered at Juntendo University Nerima Hospital between April 2017 and December 2020. After obtaining ethics committee approval, data were collected from patients' medical records.

Results: Of the 2682 pregnant women who delivered, 1550 underwent preanesthetic evaluation. There were 42 deliveries in 39 pregnant women with spinal diseases (1.7% of all pregnant women and 2.7% of those who underwent preanesthetic evaluation). The diagnoses included adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (51.3%), lumbar disc herniation (23.1%), and others. The mode of delivery was the elective cesarean section in 5 cases, emergent cesarean section in 8 cases, and vaginal delivery in 29 cases. Only one case required general anesthesia. Of the 38 cases of labor analgesia, the neuraxial block was inadequate in 3 cases (7.9%) and technically difficult in 3 cases (7.9%). However, the patients complained of no lower extremity neuropathy, infection, or inadvertent dural puncture.

Discussion: Neuraxial anesthesia was an option in most cases, even in pregnant women complicated with spinal disease, if an anesthesiologist's plan before delivery after careful preanesthetic evaluation.

Citing Articles

Insufficient Labor Epidural Analgesia Due to Asymptomatic Sacral Perineural Cyst: A Case Report.

Wakata R, Inoue M, Kasai K Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74568.

PMID: 39735095 PMC: 11672217. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74568.


Neuraxial anaesthesia in the parturient with pre-existing structural spinal pathology.

Crowe G, Drew T BJA Educ. 2024; 24(10):361-370.

PMID: 39484011 PMC: 11522780. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.05.005.


Friedreich's Ataxia and Cesarean Delivery: A Case Report of Epidural Anesthesia With Ropivacaine.

Theodosopoulou P, Mavromati M, Paraskeva A Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e61776.

PMID: 38975512 PMC: 11227031. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61776.


Is meningomyelocele an absolute contraindication for epidural labor analgesia?.

Bougaki M, Uchida K JA Clin Rep. 2023; 9(1):74.

PMID: 37924425 PMC: 10625501. DOI: 10.1186/s40981-023-00666-0.

References
1.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Cyna A, Cuthbert A . Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5:CD000331. PMC: 6494646. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. View

2.
Wong C . Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health. 2010; 1:139-54. PMC: 2971706. DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s4553. View

3.
Grabala P, Helenius I, Buchowski J, Larson A, Shah S . Back Pain and Outcomes of Pregnancy After Instrumented Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 2019; 124:e404-e410. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.106. View

4.
Moran D, Johnson M . Continuous spinal anesthesia with combined hyperbaric and isobaric bupivacaine in a patient with scoliosis. Anesth Analg. 1990; 70(4):445-7. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199004000-00017. View

5.
Chan E, Gannon S, Shannon C, Martus J, Mencio G, Bonfield C . The impact of curve severity on obstetric complications and regional anesthesia utilization in pregnant patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 43(4):E4. DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17321. View