» Articles » PMID: 37643864

Excitatory and Inhibitory Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Encode Different Aspects of a Pavlovian Cue in Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Rats

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Aug 29
PMID 37643864
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When a Pavlovian cue is presented separately from its associated reward, some animals will acquire a sign tracking (ST) response - approach and/or interaction with the cue - while others will acquire a goal tracking response - approach to the site of reward. We have previously shown that cue-evoked excitations in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) encode the vigor of both behaviors; in contrast, reward-related responses diverge over the course of training, possibly reflecting neurochemical differences between sign tracker and goal tracker individuals. However, a substantial subset of neurons in the NAc exhibit inhibitory, rather than excitatory, cue-evoked responses, and the evolution of their signaling during Pavlovian conditioning remains unknown. Using single-neuron recordings in behaving rats, we show that NAc neurons with cue-evoked inhibitions have distinct coding properties from neurons with cue-evoked excitations. Cue-evoked inhibitions become more numerous over the course of training and, like excitations, may encode the vigor of sign tracking and goal tracking behavior. However, the responses of cue-inhibited neurons do not evolve differently between sign tracker and goal tracker individuals. Moreover, cue-evoked inhibitions, unlike excitations, are insensitive to extinction of the cue-reward relationship. Finally, we show that cue-evoked excitations are greatly diminished by reward devaluation, while inhibitory cue responses are virtually unaffected. Overall, these findings converge with existing evidence that cue-excited neurons in NAc, but not cue-inhibited neurons, are profoundly sensitive to the same behavior variations that are often associated with changes in dopamine release.

Citing Articles

Distinct Action Signals by Subregions in the Nucleus Accumbens during STOP-Change Performance.

Ashton S, Sharalla P, Kang N, Brockett A, McCarthy M, Roesch M J Neurosci. 2024; 44(29).

PMID: 38897724 PMC: 11255435. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0020-24.2024.

References
1.
McDannald M, Jones J, Takahashi Y, Schoenbaum G . Learning theory: a driving force in understanding orbitofrontal function. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013; 108:22-7. PMC: 3800485. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.06.003. View

2.
Nicola S, Taha S, Kim S, Fields H . Nucleus accumbens dopamine release is necessary and sufficient to promote the behavioral response to reward-predictive cues. Neuroscience. 2005; 135(4):1025-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.088. View

3.
Keiflin R, Pribut H, Shah N, Janak P . Ventral Tegmental Dopamine Neurons Participate in Reward Identity Predictions. Curr Biol. 2018; 29(1):93-103.e3. PMC: 6324975. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.050. View

4.
Todd T, Vurbic D, Bouton M . Behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013; 108:52-64. PMC: 3946264. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.08.012. View

5.
Sunsay C, Rebec G . Extinction and reinstatement of phasic dopamine signals in the nucleus accumbens core during Pavlovian conditioning. Behav Neurosci. 2014; 128(5):579-87. PMC: 4172664. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000012. View