» Articles » PMID: 37641961

Zirconia Implants Interfere with the Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Defects in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Images Even with Artifact Reduction, a Pilot Study

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 29
PMID 37641961
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging can be considered, especially in patients with complicated peri-implantitis (PI). Artifacts induced by dense materials are the drawback of CBCT imaging and the peri-implant bone condition may not be assessed reliably because the artifacts are present in the same area. This pilot study investigates the performance of the artifact reduction algorithm (ARA) of the Planmeca Viso G7 CBCT device (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) with three different implant materials and imaging parameters.

Methods: Three pairs of dental implants consisting of titanium, zirconia, and fiber reinforced composite (FRC) were set into a pig mandible. A vertical defect simulating peri-implantitis bone loss was made on the buccal side of one of each implant. The defect was identified and measured by two observers and compared to the actual dimensions. In addition, the bone structure and the marginal cortex visibility between the implants were estimated visually.

Results: The bone defect and its dimensions with the zirconia implant could not be identified in any image with or without the metal artifact reduction algorithm. The bone defect of titanium and FRC implants were identified with all three imaging parameters or even without ARA. The interobserver agreement between the two observers was almost perfect for all categories analyzed.

Conclusion: Peri-implantitis defect of the zirconia implant and the peri-implant bone structure of the zirconia implants cannot be recognized reliably with any ARA levels, or any imaging parameters used with the Planmeca Viso G7. The need for ARA when imaging the peri-implant bone condition of the titanium and FRC implants may be unnecessary.

Citing Articles

Potential Impact of Microbial Variations After Peri-Implantitis Treatment on Peri-Implant Clinical, Radiographic, and Crevicular Parameters: A Systematic Review.

Di Spirito F, Pisano M, Di Palo M, Salzano F, Rupe A, Fiorino A Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727471 PMC: 11674133. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120414.


Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide.

Barros-Costa M, Barros-Candido J, Sampaio-Oliveira M, Freitas D, Sverzut A, Oliveira M Imaging Sci Dent. 2024; 54(2):191-199.

PMID: 38948193 PMC: 11211021. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20240016.


Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.

Capel C, da Motta R, Pauwels R, Gaeta-Araujo H, Oliveira-Santos C, Tirapelli C Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024; 53(4):233-239.

PMID: 38466923 PMC: 11056797. DOI: 10.1093/dmfr/twae008.

References
1.
Christiaens V, De Bruyn H, De Vree H, Lamoral S, Jacobs R, Cosyn J . A controlled study on the accuracy and precision of intraoral radiography in assessing interproximal bone defect morphology around teeth and implants. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018; 11(3):361-367. View

2.
Piitulainen J, Mattila R, Moritz N, Vallittu P . Load-bearing capacity and fracture behavior of glass fiber-reinforced composite cranioplasty implants. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2017; 15(4):e356-e361. DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000375. View

3.
Zitzmann N, Berglundh T . Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):286-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x. View

4.
Derks J, Tomasi C . Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 42 Suppl 16:S158-71. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12334. View

5.
Schulze R . CBCT artefact-burden of zirconia-based as compared to titanium implants for different beam energies: an analytical approach. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):15276. PMC: 9464216. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19379-y. View