» Articles » PMID: 37638692

Comparison of Individual and Pooled Sampling Methods for Estimation of () Spp. Levels in Experimentally Infected Honey Bee Colonies

Abstract

The microsporidian pathogens and are known to cause intestinal infection in honey bees and are associated with decreased colony productivity and colony loss. The widely accepted method for determining colony infection level for risk assessment and antibiotic treatment is based on spore counts of 60 pooled worker bees using light microscopy. Given that honey bee colonies consist of as many as 1,000 times more individuals, the number of bees collected for detection may significantly impact the estimated colony infection level, especially in the case of uneven distribution of high- and low-infected individuals within a hive. Hence, we compared the frequency and severity of infection in individual bees to pooled samples of 60, 120, and 180 bees, as well as compared the spp. prevalence in pooled samples of 60 and 180 bees. Overall, we did not find significant differences in spore counts in pooled samples containing incremental numbers of bees, although we observed that, in less-infected colonies, a low frequency of highly infected individuals influenced the estimated colony infection level. Moreover, spp. prevalence did not differ significantly among the pooled bee samples tested. Increasing the number of pooled bees from the recommended 60 bees to 180 bees did not yield a more accurate representation of colony infection level for highly infected colonies, but the clinical importance of a low frequency of highly infected individuals in less-infected colonies needs to be addressed in future studies.

Citing Articles

Fall Treatment with Fumagillin Contributes to an Overwinter Shift in Species Prevalence in Honey Bee Colonies in Western Canada.

Biganski S, Obshta O, Kozii I, Koziy R, Zabrodski M, Jose M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38541698 PMC: 10971274. DOI: 10.3390/life14030373.


Special section on honey bee health and disease.

Benoit-Biancamano M J Vet Diagn Invest. 2023; 35(6):595-596.

PMID: 37815222 PMC: 10621535. DOI: 10.1177/10406387231202959.

References
1.
Botias C, Martin-Hernandez R, Meana A, Higes M . Critical aspects of the Nosema spp. diagnostic sampling in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Parasitol Res. 2011; 110(6):2557-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2760-2. View

2.
Rueppell O, Hayworth M, Ross N . Altruistic self-removal of health-compromised honey bee workers from their hive. J Evol Biol. 2010; 23(7):1538-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02022.x. View

3.
Emsen B, Guzman-Novoa E, Hamiduzzaman M, Eccles L, Lacey B, Ruiz-Perez R . Higher prevalence and levels of Nosema ceranae than Nosema apis infections in Canadian honey bee colonies. Parasitol Res. 2015; 115(1):175-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4733-3. View

4.
Higes M, Martin-Hernandez R, Botias C, Bailon E, Gonzalez-Porto A, Barrios L . How natural infection by Nosema ceranae causes honeybee colony collapse. Environ Microbiol. 2008; 10(10):2659-69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01687.x. View

5.
Klein A, Vaissiere B, Cane J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham S, Kremen C . Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 274(1608):303-13. PMC: 1702377. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721. View