» Articles » PMID: 37637101

Flexible Needle Bending Model for Spinal Injection Procedures

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 28
PMID 37637101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An needle manipulation technique used by physicians when performing spinal injections is modeled to study its effect on needle shape and needle tip position. A mechanics-based model is proposed and solved using finite element method. A test setup is presented to mimic the needle manipulation motion. Tissue phantoms made from plastisol as well as porcine skeletal muscle samples are used to evaluate the model accuracy against medical images. The effect of different compression models as well as model parameters on model accuracy is studied, and the effect of needle-tissue interaction on the needle remote center of motion is examined. With the correct combination of compression model and model parameters, the model simulation is able to predict needle tip position within submillimeter accuracy.

Citing Articles

Shape Manipulation of Bevel-Tip Needles for Prostate Biopsy Procedures: A Comparison of Two Resolved-Rate Controllers.

Wang Y, Al-Zogbi L, Liu J, Shepard L, Ghazi A, Tokuda J Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2025; 2024:1-7.

PMID: 40038963 PMC: 11884662. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10781867.


Bevel-Tip Needle Deflection Modeling, Simulation, and Validation in Multi-Layer Tissues.

Wang Y, Al-Zogbi L, Liu G, Liu J, Tokuda J, Krieger A IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. 2024; 2024:11598-11604.

PMID: 39439443 PMC: 11494283. DOI: 10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610110.


Simulation-based Flexible Needle Control with Single-core FBG Feedback for Spinal Injections.

Wang Y, Xu Y, Kang J, Fritz J, Iordachita I IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2024; 6(3):1073-1083.

PMID: 39131204 PMC: 11315370. DOI: 10.1109/tmrb.2024.3421630.


In Situ Flexible Needle Adjustment Towards MRI-Guided Spinal Injections Based on Finite Element Simulation.

Wang Y, Xu Y, Kwok K, Iordachita I Int Symp Med Robot. 2023; 2023.

PMID: 38031531 PMC: 10686575. DOI: 10.1109/ismr57123.2023.10130218.

References
1.
Fritz J, U-Thainual P, Ungi T, Flammang A, Cho N, Fichtinger G . Augmented reality visualization with image overlay for MRI-guided intervention: accuracy for lumbar spinal procedures with a 1.5-T MRI system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(3):W266-73. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6918. View

2.
Stoianovici D, Jun C, Lim S, Li P, Petrisor D, Fricke S . Multi-Imager Compatible, MR Safe, Remote Center of Motion Needle-Guide Robot. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017; 65(1):165-177. PMC: 5699969. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2697766. View

3.
Susil R, Camphausen K, Choyke P, McVeigh E, Gustafson G, Ning H . System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 52(3):683-7. PMC: 2396258. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20138. View

4.
Chen Y, Xu S, Squires A, Seifabadi R, Turkbey I, Pinto P . MRI-Guided Robotically Assisted Focal Laser Ablation of the Prostate Using Canine Cadavers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017; 65(7):1434-1442. PMC: 8086175. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2756907. View

5.
Jamaluddin M, Ghosh S, Waine M, Tavakoli M, Amanie J, Murtha A . Intraoperative factors associated with stranded source placement accuracy in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2017; 16(3):497-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.01.007. View