» Articles » PMID: 37634632

Effect of Active Surgical Co-Management by Medical Hospitalists in Urology Inpatient Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Yonsei Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Aug 27
PMID 37634632
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpatient care.

Materials And Methods: Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical center, and a retrospective cohort study was conducted among co-managed urology inpatients. We assessed the clinical outcomes of urology inpatients who received SCM and compared passive SCM (co-management of patients by hospitalists only on request; March 2019 to June 2020) with active SCM (co-management of patients based on active screening by hospitalists; July 2020 to October 2021). We also evaluated the perceptions of patients who received SCM toward inpatient care quality, safety, and subjective satisfaction with inpatient care at discharge or when transferred to other wards.

Results: We assessed 525 patients. Compared with the passive SCM group (n=205), patients in the active SCM group (n=320) required co-management for a significantly shorter duration (=0.012) and tended to have a shorter length of stay at the urology ward (=0.062) and less frequent unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (=0.095) while triggering significantly fewer events of rapid response team activation (=0.002). No differences were found in the proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality rates, or inpatient care questionnaire scores.

Conclusion: Active surveillance and co-management of urology inpatients by medical hospitalists can improve the quality and efficacy of inpatient care without compromising subjective inpatient satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Economic evaluation of the hospitalist care model in an acute medical unit: a benefit-cost analysis.

Kim H, Kim J, Ohn J, Kim N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e081594.

PMID: 39079725 PMC: 11293380. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081594.

References
1.
Boddaert J, Cohen-Bittan J, Khiami F, Le Manach Y, Raux M, Beinis J . Postoperative admission to a dedicated geriatric unit decreases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e83795. PMC: 3893076. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083795. View

2.
Simon T, Eilert R, Dickinson L, Kempe A, Benefield E, Berman S . Pediatric hospitalist comanagement of spinal fusion surgery patients. J Hosp Med. 2007; 2(1):23-30. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.144. View

3.
Detsky A, Abrams H, McLaughlin J, Drucker D, Sasson Z, Johnston N . Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1986; 1(4):211-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02596184. View

4.
Kammerlander C, Roth T, Friedman S, Suhm N, Luger T, Kammerlander-Knauer U . Ortho-geriatric service--a literature review comparing different models. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21(Suppl 4):S637-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1396-x. View

5.
Pearse R, Moreno R, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C . Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 2012; 380(9847):1059-65. PMC: 3493988. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9. View