Store-and-Forward Teledermatology for Assessing Skin Cancer in 2023: Literature Review

Overview

Journal JMIR Dermatol

Specialty Dermatology

Date 2023 Aug 26

PMID 37632914

Authors

Leah Kirsten Jones

Amanda Oakley

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The role of teledermatology for skin lesion assessment has been a recent development, particularly, since the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the ability to assess patients in person. The growing number of studies relating to this area reflects the evolving interest.

Objective: This literature review aims to analyze the available research on store-and-forward teledermatology for skin lesion assessment.

Methods: MEDLINE was searched for papers from January 2010 to November 2021. Papers were searched for assessment of time management, effectiveness, and image quality.

Results: The reported effectiveness of store-and-forward teledermatology for skin lesion assessment produces heterogeneous results likely due to significant procedure variations. Most studies show high accuracy and diagnostic concordance of teledermatology compared to in-person dermatologist assessment and histopathology. This is improved through the use of teledermoscopy. Most literature shows that teledermatology reduces time to advice and definitive treatment compared to outpatient clinic assessment.

Conclusions: Overall, teledermatology offers a comparable standard of effectiveness to in-person assessment. It can save significant time in expediting advice and management. Image quality and inclusion of dermoscopy have a considerable bearing on the overall effectiveness.

Citing Articles

Teledermatology viewpoint: Sudden onset of a widespread rash.

Bernat A, Brodell R, Dolohanty L JAAD Case Rep. 2025; 57:56-58.

PMID: 40027432 PMC: 11869946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2024.10.034.

Revolutionizing Skin Cancer Triage: The Role of Patient-Initiated Teledermoscopy in Remote Diagnosis.

Foltz E, Ludzik J, Leachman S, Stoos E, Greiling T, Teske N Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39061204 PMC: 11274391. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142565.

Telehealth With Comprehensive Live-Fed Real-World Data as a Patient Care Platform for Lung Cancer: Implementation and Evaluation Study.

Zheng D, Shang Y, Ni J, Peng L, Tan X, Dai Z JMIR Cancer. 2024; 10:e45331.

PMID: 38838304 PMC: 11187506. DOI: 10.2196/45331.

Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermoscopy: Prospective Observational Study.

Fan W, Mattson G, Twigg A JMIR Dermatol. 2024; 7:e52400.

PMID: 38345831 PMC: 10897786. DOI: 10.2196/52400.

Barriers and Facilitators to Teledermatology and Tele-Eye Care in Department of Veterans Affairs Provider Settings: Qualitative Content Analysis.

Li Y, Pope C, Damonte J, Spates T, Maa A, Chen S JMIR Dermatol. 2024; 7:e50352.

PMID: 38324360 PMC: 10882469. DOI: 10.2196/50352.

References

Arzberger E, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Blum A, Chubisov D, Oakley A, Rademaker M . Teledermoscopy in High-risk Melanoma Patients: A Comparative Study of Face-to-face and Teledermatology Visits. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016; 96(6):779-83. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-2344. View

Lowe A, Atwan A, Mills C . Teledermoscopy as a community based diagnostic test in the era of COVID-19?. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021; 46(1):173-174. PMC: 9213904. DOI: 10.1111/ced.14399. View

Sunderland M, Teague R, Gale K, Rademaker M, Oakley A, Martin R . E-referrals and teledermatoscopy grading for melanoma: a successful model of care. Australas J Dermatol. 2020; 61(2):147-151. DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13230. View

Greenwald E, Tan A, Stein J, Liebman T, Bowling A, Polsky D . Real-world outcomes of melanoma surveillance using the MoleMap NZ telemedicine platform. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 85(3):596-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.057. View

Kroemer S, Fruhauf J, Campbell T, Massone C, Schwantzer G, Soyer H . Mobile teledermatology for skin tumour screening: diagnostic accuracy of clinical and dermoscopic image tele-evaluation using cellular phones. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 164(5):973-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10208.x. View

Gemelas J, Capulong D, Lau C, Mata-Diaz S, Raugi G . Positive Predictive Value of Melanoma Diagnosis in Store-and-Forward Teledermatology. Telemed J E Health. 2018; 25(8):701-707. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0056. View

Finnane A, Dallest K, Janda M, Soyer H . Teledermatology for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review. JAMA Dermatol. 2016; 153(3):319-327. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4361. View

Congalton A, Oakley A, Rademaker M, Bramley D, Martin R . Successful melanoma triage by a virtual lesion clinic (teledermatoscopy). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015; 29(12):2423-8. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13309. View

Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L . A 10-Year History of Teledermatology for Skin Cancer Management. JAMA Dermatol. 2015; 151(12):1289-1290. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3208. View

10.

Tan E, Yung A, Jameson M, Oakley A, Rademaker M . Successful triage of patients referred to a skin lesion clinic using teledermoscopy (IMAGE IT trial). Br J Dermatol. 2010; 162(4):803-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09673.x. View

11.

Kahn E, Sossong S, Goh A, Carpenter D, Goldstein S . Evaluation of skin cancer in Northern California Kaiser Permanente's store-and-forward teledermatology referral program. Telemed J E Health. 2013; 19(10):780-5. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0260. View

12.

De Giorgi V, Gori A, Savarese I, DErrico A, Grazzini M, Papi F . Teledermoscopy in doubtful melanocytic lesions: is it really useful?. Int J Dermatol. 2016; 55(10):1119-23. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.13281. View

13.

Janda M, Horsham C, Vagenas D, Loescher L, Gillespie N, Koh U . Accuracy of mobile digital teledermoscopy for skin self-examinations in adults at high risk of skin cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2020; 2(3):e129-e137. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30001-7. View

14.

Sola-Ortigosa J, Munoz-Santos C, Masat-Tico T, Isidro-Ortega J, Guilabert A . The Role of Teledermatology and Teledermoscopy in the Diagnosis of Actinic Keratosis and Field Cancerization. J Invest Dermatol. 2020; 140(10):1976-1984.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.013. View

15.

Dahlen Gyllencreutz J, Paoli J, Bjellerup M, Bucharbajeva Z, Gonzalez H, Nielsen K . Diagnostic agreement and interobserver concordance with teledermoscopy referrals. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017; 31(5):898-903. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14147. View

16.

Woodley A . Can teledermatology meet the needs of the remote and rural population?. Br J Nurs. 2021; 30(10):574-579. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.10.574. View

17.

Janda M, Loescher L, Soyer H . Enhanced skin self-examination: a novel approach to skin cancer monitoring and follow-up. JAMA Dermatol. 2013; 149(2):231-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.1218. View

18.

Snoswell C, Caffery L, Whitty J, Soyer H, Gordon L . Cost-effectiveness of Skin Cancer Referral and Consultation Using Teledermoscopy in Australia. JAMA Dermatol. 2018; 154(6):694-700. PMC: 6145645. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0855. View

19.

Gomez Arias P, Arias Blanco M, Redondo Sanchez J, Escribano Villanueva F, Velez Garcia-Nieto A . [Usefulness and efficiency of teledermoscopy in skin cancer management in primary care]. Semergen. 2020; 46(8):553-559. DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2020.06.026. View

20.

Marwaha S, Fevrier H, Alexeeff S, Crowley E, Haiman M, Pham N . Comparative effectiveness study of face-to-face and teledermatology workflows for diagnosing skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 81(5):1099-1106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.067. View