» Articles » PMID: 37631438

The Effect of Filler Dimensionality and Content on Resistive Viscoelasticity of Conductive Polymer Composites for Soft Strain Sensors

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37631438
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Soft strain sensors based on conductive polymer composites (CPCs) provide a simple and feasible detection tool in wearable electronics, soft machines, electronic skin, etc. However, the CPCs-based soft strain sensors exhibit resistive viscoelasticity (or time-dependent properties) that hinder the intuitive reflection of the accurate strain and a simple calibration process. In this paper, CPCs with different carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon black (CB) contents were prepared, and electro-mechanical experiments were conducted to study the effect of filler dimensionality and content on the resistive viscoelasticity of CPCs, aimed at guiding the fabrication of CPCs with low resistive viscoelasticity. Furthermore, resistive viscoelasticity and mechanical viscoelasticity were compared to study the origin of the resistive viscoelasticity of CPCs. We found that, at the vicinity of their percolation threshold, the CPCs exhibit high resistive viscoelasticity despite their high sensitivity. In addition, the secondary peaks for CB/SR composite were negligible when the CB concentration was low. Generally, compared with one-dimensional CNT-filled CPCs, the zero-dimensional CB-filled CPCs show higher sensitivity, lower resistive hysteresis, lower resistance relaxation ratio, and better cyclic performance, so they are more suitable for sensor usage. By comparing the resistive viscoelasticity and mechanical viscoelasticity of CPCs, it is indicated that, when the concentration of nanoparticles (NPs) approaches the percolation thresholds, the resistive viscoelasticity is mainly derived from the change of conductive network, while when the concentration of NPs is higher, it is primarily due to the unrecoverable deformations inside the material.

Citing Articles

Experimental Investigation into the Mechanical and Piezoresistive Sensing Properties of Recycled Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites for Self-Sensing Applications.

Kim B, Nam I Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39274124 PMC: 11397957. DOI: 10.3390/polym16172491.

References
1.
Wang F, Tao X . Carbon/Silicone Nanocomposite-Enabled Soft Pressure Sensors with a Liquid-Filled Cell Structure Design for Low Pressure Measurement. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(14). PMC: 8309609. DOI: 10.3390/s21144732. View

2.
Georgopoulou A, Srisawadi S, Wiroonpochit P, Clemens F . Soft Wearable Piezoresistive Sensors Based on Natural Rubber Fabricated with a Customized Vat-Based Additive Manufacturing Process. Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(10). PMC: 10220999. DOI: 10.3390/polym15102410. View

3.
Qu M, Qin Y, Sun Y, Xu H, Schubert D, Zheng K . Biocompatible, Flexible Strain Sensor Fabricated with Polydopamine-Coated Nanocomposites of Nitrile Rubber and Carbon Black. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 12(37):42140-42152. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c11937. View

4.
Liu X, Guo R, Li R, Liu H, Fan Z, Yang Y . Effect of the Processing on the Resistance-Strain Response of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube/Natural Rubber Composites for Use in Large Deformation Sensors. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021; 11(7). PMC: 8308229. DOI: 10.3390/nano11071845. View

5.
Tang X, Potschke P, Pionteck J, Li Y, Formanek P, Voit B . Tuning the Piezoresistive Behavior of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)/Carbon Nanotube Composites Using Poly(Methyl Methacrylate). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 12(38):43125-43137. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c11610. View