» Articles » PMID: 37627949

Functional MRI Lateralization [M1] of DlPFC and Implications for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Targeting

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37627949
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study investigates a potential method of optimizing effective strategies for the functional lateralization of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) while in a scanner. Effective hemisphere lateralization of the dlPFC is crucial for lowering the functional risks connected to specific interventions (such as neurosurgery and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as well as increasing the effectiveness of a given intervention by figuring out the optimal location. This task combines elements of creative problem solving, executive decision making based on an internal rule set, and working memory. A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 58 unique participants (34 males, 24 females, Mage = 42.93 years, SDage = 16.38). Of these participants, 47 were classified as right-handed, 7 were classified as left-handed, and 4 were classified as ambidextrous, according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. The imaging data were qualitatively judged by two trained, blinded investigators (neurologist and neuropsychologist) for dominant handedness (primary motor cortex) and dominant dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). The results demonstrated that 21.4% of right-handed individuals showed a dominant dlPFC localized to the right hemisphere rather than the assumed left, and 16.7% of left-handers were dominant in their left hemisphere. The task completed in the scanner might be an efficient method for localizing a potential dlPFC target for the purpose of brain stimulation (e.g., TMS), though further study replications are needed to extend and validate these findings.

Citing Articles

Neuroplasticity-based novel brain stimulation support intervention options for autistic population.

Desarkar P Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1522718.

PMID: 40026819 PMC: 11868071. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1522718.


The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function in post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhu M, Huang S, Chen W, Pan G, Zhou Y BMC Neurol. 2024; 24(1):234.

PMID: 38969994 PMC: 11225150. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03726-9.


Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation impacts the executive function of patients with vascular cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang X, Ding Q, Li Y, Li T, Li Y, Yin J Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1374395.

PMID: 38962482 PMC: 11220282. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1374395.

References
1.
Beck A, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, ERBAUGH J . An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:561-71. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. View

2.
Klooster D, Ferguson M, Boon P, Baeken C . Personalizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Parameters for Depression Treatment Using Multimodal Neuroimaging. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021; 7(6):536-545. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.11.004. View

3.
Fleischmann R, Kohn A, Trankner S, Brandt S, Schmidt S . Individualized Template MRI Is a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Individual MRI for Spatial Tracking in Navigated TMS Studies in Healthy Subjects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:174. PMC: 7241258. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00174. View

4.
Blake D, Byl N, Merzenich M . Representation of the hand in the cerebral cortex. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 135(1-2):179-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00163-8. View

5.
Mayberg H, Lozano A, Voon V, McNeely H, Seminowicz D, Hamani C . Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron. 2005; 45(5):651-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.014. View