» Articles » PMID: 37627043

Deciphering Machine Learning Decisions to Distinguish Between Posterior Fossa Tumor Types Using MRI Features: What Do the Data Tell Us?

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37627043
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models have become capable of making critical decisions on our behalf. Nevertheless, due to complexity of these models, interpreting their decisions can be challenging, and humans cannot always control them. This paper provides explanations of decisions made by ML models in diagnosing four types of posterior fossa tumors: medulloblastoma, ependymoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, and brainstem glioma. The proposed methodology involves data analysis using kernel density estimations with Gaussian distributions to examine individual MRI features, conducting an analysis on the relationships between these features, and performing a comprehensive analysis of ML model behavior. This approach offers a simple yet informative and reliable means of identifying and validating distinguishable MRI features for the diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors. By presenting a comprehensive analysis of the responses of the four pediatric tumor types to each other and to ML models in a single source, this study aims to bridge the knowledge gap in the existing literature concerning the relationship between ML and medical outcomes. The results highlight that employing a simplistic approach in the absence of very large datasets leads to significantly more pronounced and explainable outcomes, as expected. Additionally, the study also demonstrates that the pre-analysis results consistently align with the outputs of the ML models and the clinical findings reported in the existing literature.

Citing Articles

Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR images with age fusion.

Tampu I, Bianchessi T, Blystad I, Lundberg P, Nyman P, Eklund A Neurooncol Adv. 2025; 7(1):vdae205.

PMID: 39777258 PMC: 11701748. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae205.


Incidental brain tumor findings in children: prevalence, natural history, management, controversies, challenges, and dilemmas.

Soleman J, Constantini S, Roth J Childs Nerv Syst. 2024; 40(10):3179-3187.

PMID: 39215810 PMC: 11511734. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06598-z.

References
1.
Poretti A, Meoded A, Cohen K, Grotzer M, Boltshauser E, Huisman T . Apparent diffusion coefficient of pediatric cerebellar tumors: a biomarker of tumor grade?. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013; 60(12):2036-41. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24578. View

2.
Louis D, Ohgaki H, Wiestler O, Cavenee W, Burger P, Jouvet A . The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007; 114(2):97-109. PMC: 1929165. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. View

3.
Forbes J, Chambless L, Smith J, Wushensky C, Lebow R, Alvarez J . Use of T2 signal intensity of cerebellar neoplasms in pediatric patients to guide preoperative staging of the neuraxis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011; 7(2):165-74. PMC: 3777739. DOI: 10.3171/2010.11.PEDS10312. View

4.
Gimi B, Cederberg K, Derinkuyu B, Gargan L, Koral K, Bowers D . Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in distinguishing common pediatric cerebellar tumors. Acad Radiol. 2012; 19(7):794-800. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.004. View

5.
Zhou H, Hu R, Tang O, Hu C, Tang L, Chang K . Automatic Machine Learning to Differentiate Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors on Routine MR Imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020; 41(7):1279-1285. PMC: 7357647. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6621. View