» Articles » PMID: 37626817

Optimizing TMS Coil Placement Approaches for Targeting the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Depressed Adolescents: An Electric Field Modeling Study

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37626817
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) shows promise as a treatment for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents. Conventional rTMS coil placement strategies include the 5 cm, the Beam F3, and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) neuronavigation methods. The purpose of this study was to use electric field (E-field) models to compare the three targeting approaches to a computational E-field optimization coil placement method in depressed adolescents. Ten depressed adolescents (4 females, age: 15.9±1.1) participated in an open-label rTMS treatment study and were offered MRI-guided rTMS five times per week over 6-8 weeks. Head models were generated based on individual MRI images, and E-fields were simulated for the four targeting approaches. Results showed a significant difference in the induced E-fields at the L-DLPFC between the four targeting methods (χ2=24.7, p<0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed that there was a significant difference between any two of the targeting methods (Holm adjusted p<0.05), with the 5 cm rule producing the weakest E-field (46.0±17.4V/m), followed by the F3 method (87.4±35.4V/m), followed by MRI-guided (112.1±14.6V/m), and followed by the computational approach (130.1±18.1V/m). Variance analysis showed that there was a significant difference in sample variance between the groups (K2=8.0, p<0.05), with F3 having the largest variance. Participants who completed the full course of treatment had median E-fields correlated with depression symptom improvement (r=-0.77, p<0.05). E-field models revealed limitations of scalp-based methods compared to MRI guidance, suggesting computational optimization could enhance dose delivery to the target.

Citing Articles

Novel Volume Integral Equation Approach for Low-Frequency E-Field Dosimetry of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Vaezi S, Gomez L IEEE Trans Magn. 2024; 60(12).

PMID: 39649150 PMC: 11623319. DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2024.3486081.


Multi-scale modeling to investigate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on morphologically-realistic neuron with depression.

Li L, Zhang S, Wang H, Zhang F, Dong B, Yang J Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(5):3139-3156.

PMID: 39555260 PMC: 11564609. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10142-9.


A semi-automated pipeline for finite element modeling of electric field induced in nonhuman primates by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Goswami N, Shen M, Gomez L, Dannhauer M, Sommer M, Peterchev A J Neurosci Methods. 2024; 408:110176.

PMID: 38795980 PMC: 11227653. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110176.


Electric Field Modeling in Personalizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Interventions.

Dannhauer M, Gomez L, Robins P, Wang D, Hasan N, Thielscher A Biol Psychiatry. 2023; 95(6):494-501.

PMID: 38061463 PMC: 10922371. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.022.


Treatment-Resistant Depression in America Latina study: one-year follow-up of treatment resistant depression patients under standard of care reveals insights on quality of life, disability, work impairment, and depressive symptoms.

Recco K, Bonetto G, Lupo C, Nardi A, Morales A, Becerra-Palars C Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1221746.

PMID: 37965358 PMC: 10641694. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1221746.


References
1.
Feffer K, Fettes P, Giacobbe P, Daskalakis Z, Blumberger D, Downar J . 1Hz rTMS of the right orbitofrontal cortex for major depression: Safety, tolerability and clinical outcomes. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017; 28(1):109-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.11.011. View

2.
Dunlop K, Sheen J, Schulze L, Fettes P, Mansouri F, Feffer K . Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-refractory major depressive disorder: A three-arm, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2019; 13(2):337-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.020. View

3.
Magavi L, Reti I, Vasa R . A review of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for adolescents with treatment-resistant depression. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017; 29(2):79-88. DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2017.1300574. View

4.
Plonsey R, Heppner D . Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Bull Math Biophys. 1967; 29(4):657-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF02476917. View

5.
Zhang B, Stohrmann P, Godbersen G, Unterholzner J, Kasper S, Kranz G . Normal component of TMS-induced electric field is correlated with depressive symptom relief in treatment-resistant depression. Brain Stimul. 2022; 15(5):1318-1320. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.09.006. View