» Articles » PMID: 37626554

Investigation of Cross-Language and Stimulus-Dependent Effects on the McGurk Effect with Finnish and Japanese Speakers and Listeners

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37626554
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the McGurk effect, perception of a spoken consonant is altered when an auditory (A) syllable is presented with an incongruent visual (V) syllable (e.g., A/pa/V/ka/ is often heard as /ka/ or /ta/). The McGurk effect provides a measure for visual influence on speech perception, becoming stronger the lower the proportion of auditory correct responses. Cross-language effects are studied to understand processing differences between one's own and foreign languages. Regarding the McGurk effect, it has sometimes been found to be stronger with foreign speakers. However, other studies have shown the opposite, or no difference between languages. Most studies have compared English with other languages. We investigated cross-language effects with native Finnish and Japanese speakers and listeners. Both groups of listeners had 49 participants. The stimuli (/ka/, /pa/, /ta/) were uttered by two female and male Finnish and Japanese speakers and presented in A, V and AV modality, including a McGurk stimulus A/pa/V/ka/. The McGurk effect was stronger with Japanese stimuli in both groups. Differences in speech perception were prominent between individual speakers but less so between native languages. Unisensory perception correlated with McGurk perception. These findings suggest that stimulus-dependent features contribute to the McGurk effect. This may have a stronger influence on syllable perception than cross-language factors.

Citing Articles

The noisy encoding of disparity model predicts perception of the McGurk effect in native Japanese speakers.

Magnotti J, Lado A, Beauchamp M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1421713.

PMID: 38988770 PMC: 11233445. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1421713.


Advances in Understanding the Phenomena and Processing in Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Tiippana K Brain Sci. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37759946 PMC: 10527222. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091345.

References
1.
van de Rijt L, Roye A, Mylanus E, Van Opstal A, van Wanrooij M . The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Audiovisual Speech Perception. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13:335. PMC: 6775866. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00335. View

2.
Stein B, Stanford T, Ramachandran R, Perrault Jr T, Rowland B . Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness. Exp Brain Res. 2009; 198(2-3):113-26. PMC: 3056521. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1880-8. View

3.
Yasufuku K, Doyle G . Echoes of L1 Syllable Structure in L2 Phoneme Recognition. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:515237. PMC: 8329372. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.515237. View

4.
Magnotti J, Basu Mallick D, Feng G, Zhou B, Zhou W, Beauchamp M . Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers. Exp Brain Res. 2015; 233(9):2581-6. PMC: 4536079. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4324-7. View

5.
Soto-Faraco S, Alsius A . Deconstructing the McGurk-MacDonald illusion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009; 35(2):580-7. DOI: 10.1037/a0013483. View