» Articles » PMID: 37626548

Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid and Glutamate Concentrations in the Striatum and Anterior Cingulate Cortex Not Found to Be Associated with Cognitive Flexibility

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37626548
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Behavioral flexibility and goal-directed behavior heavily depend on fronto-striatal networks. Within these circuits, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate play an important role in (motor) response inhibition, but it has remained largely unclear whether they are also relevant for cognitive inhibition. We hence investigated the functional role of these transmitters for cognitive inhibition during cognitive flexibility. Healthy young adults performed two paradigms assessing different aspects of cognitive flexibility. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was used to quantify GABA+ and total glutamate/glutamine (Glx) levels in the striatum and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) referenced to N-acetylaspartate (NAA). We observed typical task switching and backward inhibition effects, but striatal and ACC concentrations of GABA+/NAA and Glx/NAA were not associated with cognitive flexibility in a functionally relevant manner. The assumption of null effects was underpinned by Bayesian testing. These findings suggest that behavioral and cognitive inhibition are functionally distinct faculties, that depend on (at least partly) different brain structures and neurotransmitter systems. While previous studies consistently demonstrated that motor response inhibition is modulated by ACC and striatal GABA levels, our results suggest that the functionally distinct cognitive inhibition required for successful switching is not, or at least to a much lesser degree, modulated by these factors.

Citing Articles

Catecholaminergic Modulation of Metacontrol Is Reflected in Aperiodic EEG Activity and Predicted by Baseline GABA+ and Glx Concentrations.

Gao Y, Koyun A, Stock A, Werner A, Roessner V, Colzato L Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(4):e70173.

PMID: 40035382 PMC: 11877340. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70173.


Association between Inhibitory-Excitatory Balance and Brain Activity Response during Cognitive Flexibility in Young and Older Individuals.

Rodriguez-Nieto G, Alvarez-Anacona D, Mantini D, Edden R, Oeltzschner G, Sunaert S J Neurosci. 2024; 44(36).

PMID: 39134417 PMC: 11376334. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0355-24.2024.

References
1.
Zhang R, Stock A, Fischer R, Beste C . The system neurophysiological basis of backward inhibition. Brain Struct Funct. 2016; 221(9):4575-4587. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-016-1186-0. View

2.
Kehagia A, Barker R, Robbins T . Revisiting the effects of Parkinson's disease and frontal lobe lesions on task switching: the role of rule reconfiguration. J Neuropsychol. 2013; 8(1):53-74. DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12004. View

3.
DEsposito M, Postle B . The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:115-42. PMC: 4374359. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031. View

4.
Provencher S . Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1993; 30(6):672-9. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910300604. View

5.
Humphries M, Stewart R, Gurney K . A physiologically plausible model of action selection and oscillatory activity in the basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(50):12921-42. PMC: 6674973. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3486-06.2006. View