» Articles » PMID: 37625105

Distress Thermometer Score Is Useful For Predicting Suicidal Ideation in Patients With Cancer

Overview
Journal JCO Glob Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Aug 25
PMID 37625105
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Suicidal ideation (SI) and depressive symptoms are common in patients with cancer. A Distress Thermometer (DT) is an effective tool to screen depression and anxiety in such cohorts. We investigated the value of the DT for predicting SI and the prevalence and associated risk factors of SI in the study population.

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled a total of 162 heterogeneous patients with cancer. Information regarding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, DT score, and the past month SI were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to find accuracy and the optimal cutoff score for predicting risk of SI. The significance of difference between DT scores was obtained using the median independence test. Likelihood of risk was analyzed through odds ratio.

Results: DT possesses good overall accuracy (area under the ROC curve = 0.797) for predicting SI in patients with cancer. The DT had a sensitivity of 0.929 and a specificity of 0.522 with a cutoff score of ≥4. The patients with SI had significantly higher DT scores than the patients without SI (7 [5,8] 3 [1,6]; < .001). The 1-month prevalence of SI was 17.3%. Depression, anxiety, and psychological distress were the predictive factors of SI.

Conclusion: SI is a global issue in patients with cancer. The DT scores may be a rapid predicting tool for identifying SI in patients with cancer. Higher DT scores and patients with psychosocial problems need to be routinely screened for SI, which may help to prevent suicidal risk.

Citing Articles

Patient-Reported Distress in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer.

White M, Corbett C, Cannon T, Watts T, Jiang R, Osazuwa-Peters N JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 151(2):160-169.

PMID: 39699883 PMC: 11826365. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4357.

References
1.
Cutillo A, OHea E, Person S, Lessard D, Harralson T, Boudreaux E . The Distress Thermometer: Cutoff Points and Clinical Use. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018; 44(3):329-336. PMC: 5839660. DOI: 10.1188/17.ONF.329-336. View

2.
Nock M, Borges G, Bromet E, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Beautrais A . Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. Br J Psychiatry. 2008; 192(2):98-105. PMC: 2259024. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040113. View

3.
Munson S, Cabrera-Sanchez P, Miller S, Phillips K . Distress and Factors Associated with Suicidal Ideation in Veterans Living with Cancer. Fed Pract. 2020; 37(Suppl 2):S8-S15. PMC: 7497877. View

4.
Risal A, Manandhar K, Linde M, Koju R, Steiner T, Holen A . Reliability and Validity of a Nepali-language Version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2015; 13(50):115-24. DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v13i2.16783. View

5.
Baryshnikov I, Rosenstrom T, Jylha P, Vuorilehto M, Holma M, Holma I . Role of Hopelessness in Suicidal Ideation Among Patients With Depressive Disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020; 81(2). DOI: 10.4088/JCP.19m12866. View