» Articles » PMID: 37624314

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cytology in Severe Equine Asthma: Cytocentrifugated Versus Sediment Smear Preparations

Overview
Journal Vet Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Aug 25
PMID 37624314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Equine asthma is a common respiratory disease that may affect horses of any age. The diagnosis of severe equine asthma (SEA) (historically referred as recurrent airway obstruction or RAO) is based mainly on the history of the animal and clinical signs, which are further supported by the cytological examination of the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). This can also be helpful in monitoring the inflammation of the lower airways in response to environmental management and medication. The cytocentrifugated preparation is usually considered the method of choice for BAL cytological interpretation. The aim of this study was to compare the results in terms of differential cell counts (DCC) in BAL cytology performed on sedimented smears and cytocentrifugated preparations. To carry this out, 48 BAL samples were collected from six horses with SEA that were subjected to a process of exacerbation of the disease by environmental stimuli, which was later followed by the appropriate treatment. Each collected BAL fluid was equally divided into duplicate portions: one processed by cytocentrifugation and one by sediment smear from simple centrifugation. Cytologic examination of all BAL by both methods showed poor concordance in DCC, although it was still able to allow diagnostic recognition of severe lung neutrophilic disorders. These results suggest that sediment smear preparation, although remaining a useful method in general equine practice associated with clinical assessments in the diagnosis of SEA under conditions where there is no possibility of using a cytocentrifuge, cannot be considered a comparable alternative.

Citing Articles

The Most Common Environmental Risk Factors for Equine Asthma-A Narrative Review.

Mankowska A, Witkowska D Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061524 PMC: 11273653. DOI: 10.3390/ani14142062.

References
1.
Fogarty U, Buckley T . Bronchoalveolar lavage findings in horses with exercise intolerance. Equine Vet J. 1991; 23(6):434-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb03756.x. View

2.
Tee S, Dart A, MacDonald M, Perkins N, Horadagoda N, Jeffcott L . Effects of collecting serial tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage samples on the cytological findings of subsequent fluid samples in healthy Standardbred horses. Aust Vet J. 2012; 90(7):247-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00950.x. View

3.
Hoffman A . Bronchoalveolar lavage: sampling technique and guidelines for cytologic preparation and interpretation. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2008; 24(2):423-35, vii-viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2008.04.003. View

4.
Lapointe J, Vrins A, Lavoie J . Effects of centrifugation and specimen preparation technique on bronchoalveolar lavage analysis in horses. Equine Vet J. 1994; 26(3):227-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04374.x. View

5.
Sweeney C, Rossier Y, Ziemer E, Lindborg S . Effects of lung site and fluid volume on results of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis in horses. Am J Vet Res. 1992; 53(8):1376-9. View