» Articles » PMID: 37622941

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a Premaxillary Device: A New Type of Subperiosteal Implant to Treat Severe Atrophy of the Maxilla

Abstract

Extreme atrophy of the maxilla still poses challenges for clinicians. Some of the techniques used to address this issue can be complex, risky, expensive, and time consuming, often requiring skilled surgeons. While many commonly used techniques have achieved very high success rates, complications may arise in certain cases. In this context, the premaxillary device (PD) technique offers a simpler approach to reconstruct severely atrophic maxillae, aiming to avoid more complicated and risky surgical procedures. Finite element analysis (FEA) enables the evaluation of different aspects of dental implant biomechanics. Our results demonstrated that using a PD allows for an optimal distribution of stresses on the basal bone, avoiding tension peaks that can lead to bone resorption or implant failure. ANSYS was used to perform localized finite element analysis (FEA), enabling a more precise examination of the peri-crestal area and the PD through an accurate mesh element reconstruction, which facilitated the mathematical solution of FEA. The most favorable biomechanical behavior was observed for materials such as titanium alloys, which helped to reduce stress levels on bone, implants, screws, and abutments. Additionally, stress values remained within the limits of basal bone and titanium alloy strengths. In conclusion, from a biomechanical point of view, PDs appear to be viable alternatives for rehabilitating severe atrophic maxillae.

Citing Articles

A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior.

Ceddia M, Lamberti L, Trentadue B Biomimetics (Basel). 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39997095 PMC: 11853378. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics10020072.


New Subperiosteal Dental Implant Design with Finite Element Analysis and Mechanical Validation: A Design Validation Study.

Vanaclocha V, Atienza C, Vanaclocha A, Penuelas A, Gomez-Herrero J, Perez-Carrio F Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(3).

PMID: 39942288 PMC: 11820550. DOI: 10.3390/ma18030622.


Comparison of Screws with Different Diameters in Subperiosteal Implant Application with Finite Element Analysis.

Kundakcioglu A, Gedik B Int J Med Sci. 2024; 21(13):2595-2602.

PMID: 39439467 PMC: 11492873. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.93225.


The Stresses and Deformations in the Abfraction Lesions of the Lower Premolars Studied by the Finite Element Analyses: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Costachel B, Bechir A, Tarcolea M, Mihai L, Burcea A, Bechir E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38667434 PMC: 11048859. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14080788.


Exceptional Cases Demand Exceptional Personalized Solutions: The Next Level in Dental Rehabilitation.

Gellrich N, Korn P, Jehn P, Neuhaus M, Lentge F, Rahlf B J Pers Med. 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38541036 PMC: 10971234. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14030294.


References
1.
Al-Dajani M . Recent Trends in Sinus Lift Surgery and Their Clinical Implications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 18(1):204-12. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12275. View

2.
Mangano C, Bianchi A, Mangano F, Dana J, Colombo M, Solop I . Custom-made 3D printed subperiosteal titanium implants for the prosthetic restoration of the atrophic posterior mandible of elderly patients: a case series. 3D Print Med. 2020; 6(1):1. PMC: 6950914. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-019-0055-x. View

3.
Taylor T, Belser U . Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 11 Suppl 1:108-25. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1108.x. View

4.
Seong W, Kim U, Swift J, Heo Y, Hodges J, Ko C . Elastic properties and apparent density of human edentulous maxilla and mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(10):1088-93. PMC: 2743800. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.025. View

5.
Stanford C . Academy of Osseointegration's Summit on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Edentulous Maxilla: Overview, Process, and Outcomes-Changing the Face of Implant Dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31 Suppl:s6-s15. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.16suppl.ovw. View