» Articles » PMID: 37619306

Revealing the Factors Resulting in Incomplete Recovery of Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAAs) when Implementing the Adsorbable and Extractable Organic Fluorine Methods

Overview
Journal Water Res
Date 2023 Aug 24
PMID 37619306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are environmental contaminants of concern. Techniques that quantify total organic fluorine (TOF) such as the adsorbable organic fluorine (AOF) and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) methods are important for PFAS risk assessments. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate each step of the AOF (loading, washing, combustion) and EOF (loading, washing, elution, combustion) methods for the recovery of ten ultrashort-, short-, and long-chain unsubstituted perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs). We measured the overall recovery of fluoride for each method for each PFAA, and the recovery of each PFAA around the loading, washing, and elution steps. We also measured the combustion efficiency of each PFAA by direct combustion. The overall AOF and EOF recovery ranged from 9.3%-103.3% to 21.0%-108.1%, respectively, with higher recoveries measured for PFAAs with increasing chain length in both methods. The three ultrashort-chain PFAAs (trifluoroacetic acid, perfluoropropionic acid, and perfluoropropanesulfonic acid) exhibited the lowest overall recoveries from 9.3-25.2% for AOF and 21.0-51.5% for EOF. We found that decreases in the overall recovery are the result of losses of ultrashort- and short-chain PFAAs during the washing step and the incomplete mineralization of perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids during combustion for AOF and incomplete elution of short- and long-chain PFAAs and the loss of ultrashort-chain PFAAs during the washing step for EOF. Our data suggest that the EOF method is more appropriate than the AOF method for measuring TOF in samples containing ultrashort- and short-chain PFAAs and that methodological improvements are possible with a focus on the washing, elution, and combustion steps.

Citing Articles

High organofluorine concentrations in municipal wastewater affect downstream drinking water supplies for millions of Americans.

Ruyle B, Pennoyer E, Vojta S, Becanova J, Islam M, Webster T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(3):e2417156122.

PMID: 39761386 PMC: 11761303. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2417156122.


Latest trends in the environmental analysis of PFAS including nontarget analysis and EOF-, AOF-, and TOP-based methodologies.

Baqar M, Chen H, Yao Y, Sun H Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 417(3):555-571.

PMID: 39570388 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05643-9.


City-scale impacts of PFAS from normal and elevated temperature landfill leachates on wastewater treatment plant influent.

Collins A, Krause M, Bessler S, Brougham A, McKnight T, Strock T J Hazard Mater. 2024; 480:136270.

PMID: 39461289 PMC: 11645521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136270.


Characterizing the Areal Extent of PFAS Contamination in Fish Species Downgradient of AFFF Source Zones.

Pickard H, Ruyle B, Haque F, Logan J, LeBlanc D, Vojta S Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(43):19440-19453.

PMID: 39412174 PMC: 11526379. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c07016.


Electrocatalytic water treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances reduces adsorbable organofluorine and bioaccumulation potential.

Lin Z, Ersan M, Garcia-Segura S, Perreault F, Westerhoff P RSC Adv. 2024; 14(22):15627-15636.

PMID: 38746838 PMC: 11091601. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra02448f.