» Articles » PMID: 37615601

Value of Information Analysis of a Web-Based Self-Management Intervention for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 24
PMID 37615601
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Technology-based programs can be cost-effective in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, cost-effectiveness estimates always contain some uncertainty, and decisions based upon them carry some risk. We conducted a value of information (VOI) analysis to estimate the value of additional research of a web-based self-management intervention for COPD to reduce the costs associated with uncertainty. We used a 10,000-iteration cost-effectiveness model from the health care payer perspective to calculate the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) at the patient- and population-level. An opportunity loss was incurred when the web-based intervention did not produce a greater net monetary benefit than usual care in an iteration. We calculated the probability of opportunity loss and magnitude of opportunity costs as a function of baseline health utility. We aggregated opportunity costs over the projected incident population of inpatient COPD patients over 10 years and estimated it as a function of the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Costs are in 2022 U.S. Dollars. Opportunity losses were found in 22.7% of the iterations. The was $78 per patient (95% confidence interval: $75-$82). The probability that the intervention was the optimal strategy varied across baseline health utilities. The was $506,666,882 over 10 years for a WTP of $50,000. Research estimated to cost up to $500 million would be warranted to reduce uncertainty. Future research could focus on identifying the impact of baseline health utilities to maximize the cost savings of the intervention. Other considerations for future research priorities include implementation efforts for technology-based interventions.

Citing Articles

Maintenance Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An Update and Future Directions.

Moy M Respir Care. 2024; 69(6):724-739.

PMID: 38744473 PMC: 11147634. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11609.

References
1.
Zwerink M, Kerstjens H, van der Palen J, van der Valk P, Brusse-Keizer M, Zielhuis G . (Cost-)effectiveness of self-treatment of exacerbations in patients with COPD: 2 years follow-up of a RCT. Respirology. 2015; 21(3):497-503. DOI: 10.1111/resp.12697. View

2.
Claxton K, Sculpher M, Drummond M . A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE). Lancet. 2002; 360(9334):711-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09832-X. View

3.
Rothery C, Strong M, Koffijberg H, Basu A, Ghabri S, Knies S . Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2020; 23(3):277-286. PMC: 7373630. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.004. View

4.
Robinson S, Bamonti P, Richardson C, Kadri R, Moy M . Rural disparities impact response to a web-based physical activity self-management intervention in COPD: A secondary analysis. J Rural Health. 2023; 40(1):140-150. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12765. View

5.
Song X, Hallensleben C, Zhang W, Jiang Z, Shen H, Gobbens R . Blended Self-Management Interventions to Reduce Disease Burden in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(3):e24602. PMC: 8047793. DOI: 10.2196/24602. View