Poroelastic Behavior and Water Permeability of Human Skin at the Nanoscale

Overview

Journal PNAS Nexus

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Aug 24

PMID 37614672

Authors

Ramin Oftadeh

Mojtaba Azadi

Mark Donovan

Jessica Langer

I-Chien Liao

Christine Ortiz

Alan J Grodzinsky

Gustavo S Luengo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Topical skin care products and hydrating compositions (moisturizers or injectable fillers) have been used for years to improve the appearance of, for example facial wrinkles, or to increase "plumpness". Most of the studies have addressed these changes based on the overall mechanical changes associated with an increase in hydration state. However, little is known about the water mobility contribution to these changes as well as the consequences to the specific skin layers. This is important as the biophysical properties and the biochemical composition of normal stratum corneum, epithelium, and dermis vary tremendously from one another. Our current studies and results reported here have focused on a novel approach (dynamic atomic force microscopy-based nanoindentation) to quantify biophysical characteristics of individual layers of ex vivo human skin. We have discovered that our new methods are highly sensitive to the mechanical properties of individual skin layers, as well as their hydration properties. Furthermore, our methods can assess the ability of these individual layers to respond to both compressive and shear deformations. In addition, since human skin is mechanically loaded over a wide range of deformation rates (frequencies), we studied the biophysical properties of skin over a wide frequency range. The poroelasticity model used helps to quantify the hydraulic permeability of the skin layers, providing an innovative method to evaluate and interpret the impact of hydrating compositions on water mobility of these different skin layers.

References

Kao A, Connelly J, Barber A . 3D nanomechanical evaluations of dermal structures in skin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015; 57:14-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.017. View

Soulhat J, Buschmann M, Shirazi-Adl A . A fibril-network-reinforced biphasic model of cartilage in unconfined compression. J Biomech Eng. 1999; 121(3):340-7. DOI: 10.1115/1.2798330. View

Nia H, Han L, Li Y, Ortiz C, Grodzinsky A . Poroelasticity of cartilage at the nanoscale. Biophys J. 2011; 101(9):2304-13. PMC: 3207157. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.011. View

Nia H, Han L, Bozchalooi I, Roughley P, Youcef-Toumi K, Grodzinsky A . Aggrecan nanoscale solid-fluid interactions are a primary determinant of cartilage dynamic mechanical properties. ACS Nano. 2015; 9(3):2614-25. PMC: 6713486. DOI: 10.1021/nn5062707. View

Lapeer R, Gasson P, Karri V . Simulating plastic surgery: from human skin tensile tests, through hyperelastic finite element models to real-time haptics. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2010; 103(2-3):208-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.013. View

Crichton M, Chen X, Huang H, Kendall M . Elastic modulus and viscoelastic properties of full thickness skin characterised at micro scales. Biomaterials. 2012; 34(8):2087-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.035. View

Oftadeh R, Connizzo B, Nia H, Ortiz C, Grodzinsky A . Biological connective tissues exhibit viscoelastic and poroelastic behavior at different frequency regimes: Application to tendon and skin biophysics. Acta Biomater. 2018; 70:249-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.041. View

Verdier-Sevrain S, Bonte F . Skin hydration: a review on its molecular mechanisms. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007; 6(2):75-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2007.00300.x. View

BLANK I, Moloney 3rd J, Emslie A, Simon I, Apt C . The diffusion of water across the stratum corneum as a function of its water content. J Invest Dermatol. 1984; 82(2):188-94. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12259835. View

10.

Crichton M, Donose B, Chen X, Raphael A, Huang H, Kendall M . The viscoelastic, hyperelastic and scale dependent behaviour of freshly excised individual skin layers. Biomaterials. 2011; 32(20):4670-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.012. View

11.

Wang Y, Marshall K, Baba Y, Lumpkin E, Gerling G . Compressive viscoelasticity of freshly excised mouse skin is dependent on specimen thickness, strain level and rate. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0120897. PMC: 4372409. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120897. View

12.

Wong W, Joyce T, Goh K . Resolving the viscoelasticity and anisotropy dependence of the mechanical properties of skin from a porcine model. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015; 15(2):433-46. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-015-0700-2. View

13.

Han L, Frank E, Greene J, Lee H, Hung H, Grodzinsky A . Time-dependent nanomechanics of cartilage. Biophys J. 2011; 100(7):1846-54. PMC: 3072655. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.02.031. View

14.

Santoprete R, Hourblin V, Foucher A, Dufour O, Bernard D, Domanov Y . Reduction of wrinkles: From a computational hypothesis to a clinical, instrumental, and biological proof. Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29(3):e13267. PMC: 10155799. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13267. View

15.

Leyva-Mendivil M, Lengiewicz J, Page A, Bressloff N, Limbert G . Skin Microstructure is a Key Contributor to Its Friction Behaviour. Tribol Lett. 2020; 65(1):12. PMC: 6961497. DOI: 10.1007/s11249-016-0794-4. View

16.

Potts R, Francoeur M . The influence of stratum corneum morphology on water permeability. J Invest Dermatol. 1991; 96(4):495-9. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470197. View

17.

Caberlotto E, Bernal M, Miller Z, Poole A, Ruiz L, Tanter M . Controlled mechanical vibration and impacts on skin biology. Skin Res Technol. 2019; 25(6):881-889. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12753. View

18.

Darlenski R, Sassning S, Tsankov N, Fluhr J . Non-invasive in vivo methods for investigation of the skin barrier physical properties. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009; 72(2):295-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.11.013. View

19.

Doge N, Avetisyan A, Hadam S, Pfannes E, Rancan F, Blume-Peytavi U . Assessment of skin barrier function and biochemical changes of ex vivo human skin in response to physical and chemical barrier disruption. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016; 116:138-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.12.012. View

20.

Reuss L, Hirst B . Water transport controversies--an overview. J Physiol. 2002; 542(Pt 1):1-2. PMC: 2290403. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.024109. View