» Articles » PMID: 37614402

Postural Sway in Lower Extremity Amputees and Older Adults May Suggest Increased Fall Risk in Amputees

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 24
PMID 37614402
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Falls can be detrimental to overall health and quality of life for lower extremity amputees. Most previous studies of postural steadiness focus on quantification of time series variables extracted from postural sway signals. While it has been suggested that frequency domain variables can provide more valuable information, few current studies have evaluated postural sway in amputees using frequency domain variables.

Methodology: Participants were assigned to 3 groups: lower extremity amputation (n=6), healthy young adults (n=10), and healthy older adults (n=10). Standing barefoot on a force platform, each individual completed 3 trials of each of 3 standing conditions: eyes open, eyes closed, and standing on a foam balance pad. Time and frequency domain variables of postural sway were computed and analyzed.

Results: Comparison of older adults, younger adults, and amputees on the three conditions of standing eyes open, eyes closed, and on foam revealed significant differences between groups. Mean mediolateral (ML) sway distance from the center of pressure (COP), total excursions and sway velocity was significantly higher for amputees and older adults when compared to young adults (p<0.05). Furthermore, power of sway signal was substantially lower for both amputees and older adults. When compared to that of older adults, postural steadiness of amputees was more affected by the eyes closed condition, whereas older adults' was more affected when sensory and proprioceptive information was perturbed by standing on foam.

Conclusion: Our findings showed that fall risk is greater in amputees than in young adults without amputation. Additionally, amputees may rely more heavily on visual information than proprioceptive information for balance, in contrast to older and young adults without amputation.

Citing Articles

Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on postural control of individuals with major depressive disorder: A case report.

Bateni H, Soltani E, Ali K, Zhou H, Shad M SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023; 11:2050313X231153757.

PMID: 36816824 PMC: 9932753. DOI: 10.1177/2050313X231153757.

References
1.
Arifin N, Abu Osman N, Ali S, Wan Abas W . The effects of prosthetic foot type and visual alteration on postural steadiness in below-knee amputees. Biomed Eng Online. 2014; 13(1):23. PMC: 3975715. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-23. View

2.
Grise M, Potvin D . Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(6):706-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90177-6. View

3.
de Haart M, Geurts A, Huidekoper S, Fasotti L, van Limbeek J . Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(6):886-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.05.012. View

4.
Hilliard M, Martinez K, Janssen I, Edwards B, Mille M, Zhang Y . Lateral balance factors predict future falls in community-living older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(9):1708-13. PMC: 2953551. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.023. View

5.
Buckley J, ODriscoll D, Bennett S . Postural sway and active balance performance in highly active lower-limb amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 81(1):13-20. DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200201000-00004. View