» Articles » PMID: 37610492

ASO Author Reflections: Laparoscopic Anatomical Segment 8 Resection Using Digital Intelligent Liver Surgery Technologies: The Combination of Multiple Navigation Approaches

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Aug 23
PMID 37610492
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

A pilot study of virtual liver segment projection technology in subsegment-oriented laparoscopic anatomical liver resection when indocyanine green staining fails (with video).

Zeng X, Deng H, Dong Y, Hu H, Fang C, Xiang N Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(7):4057-4066.

PMID: 38806957 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10912-w.

References
1.
Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi R, Alikhanov R . The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation. Ann Surg. 2017; 268(1):11-18. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524. View

2.
Chieh A, Chan A, Rotellar F, Kim K . Laparoscopic major liver resections: Current standards. Int J Surg. 2020; 82S:169-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.051. View

3.
Linn Y, Wu A, Han H, Liu R, Chen K, Fuks D . Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022; 30(1):36-59. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1211. View

4.
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y . A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014; 21(10):745-53. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.166. View

5.
Efanov M, Salimgereeva D, Alikhanov R, Wu A, Geller D, Cipriani F . Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022; 30(2):177-191. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1210. View