ASO Author Reflections: Laparoscopic Anatomical Segment 8 Resection Using Digital Intelligent Liver Surgery Technologies: The Combination of Multiple Navigation Approaches
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Zeng X, Deng H, Dong Y, Hu H, Fang C, Xiang N Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(7):4057-4066.
PMID: 38806957 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10912-w.
References
1.
Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi R, Alikhanov R
. The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation. Ann Surg. 2017; 268(1):11-18.
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
View
2.
Chieh A, Chan A, Rotellar F, Kim K
. Laparoscopic major liver resections: Current standards. Int J Surg. 2020; 82S:169-177.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.051.
View
3.
Linn Y, Wu A, Han H, Liu R, Chen K, Fuks D
. Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022; 30(1):36-59.
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1211.
View
4.
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y
. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014; 21(10):745-53.
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.166.
View
5.
Efanov M, Salimgereeva D, Alikhanov R, Wu A, Geller D, Cipriani F
. Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022; 30(2):177-191.
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1210.
View