» Articles » PMID: 37609377

Carbon Nanofiber Growth Rates on NiCu Catalysts: Quantitative Coupling of Macroscopic and Nanoscale In Situ Studies

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since recently, gas-cell transmission electron microscopy allows for direct, nanoscale imaging of catalysts during reaction. However, often systems are too perturbed by the imaging conditions to be relevant for real-life catalyzed conversions. We followed carbon nanofiber growth from NiCu-catalyzed methane decomposition under working conditions (550 °C, 1 bar of 5% H, 45% CH, and 50% Ar), directly comparing the time-resolved overall carbon growth rates in a reactor (measured gravimetrically) and nanometer-scale carbon growth observations (by electron microscopy). Good quantitative agreement in time-dependent growth rates allowed for validation of the electron microscopy measurements and detailed insight into the contribution of individual catalyst nanoparticles in these inherently heterogeneous catalysts to the overall carbon growth. The smallest particles did not contribute significantly to carbon growth, while larger particles (8-16 nm) exhibited high carbon growth rates but deactivated quickly. Even larger particles grew carbon slowly without significant deactivation. This methodology paves the way to understanding macroscopic rates of catalyzed reactions based on nanoscale in situ observations.

Citing Articles

Balancing act: influence of Cu content in NiCu/C catalysts for methane decomposition.

Schoemaker S, Bismeijer S, Wezendonk D, Meeldijk J, Welling T, de Jongh P Mater Adv. 2024; 5(10):4251-4261.

PMID: 38774838 PMC: 11103560. DOI: 10.1039/d4ma00138a.


Direct Observation of Ni Nanoparticle Growth in Carbon-Supported Nickel under Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation Atmosphere.

Visser N, Turner S, Stewart J, Vandegehuchte B, van der Hoeven J, de Jongh P ACS Nano. 2023; 17(15):14963-14973.

PMID: 37504574 PMC: 10416566. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c03721.

References
1.
Liu X, Wang M, Zhang S, Pan B . Application potential of carbon nanotubes in water treatment: A review. J Environ Sci (China). 2013; 25(7):1263-80. DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(12)60161-2. View

2.
Hofmann S, Sharma R, Ducati C, Du G, Mattevi C, Cepek C . In situ observations of catalyst dynamics during surface-bound carbon nanotube nucleation. Nano Lett. 2007; 7(3):602-8. DOI: 10.1021/nl0624824. View

3.
Lyu Y, Wang P, Liu D, Zhang F, Senftle T, Zhang G . Tracing the Active Phase and Dynamics for Carbon Nanofiber Growth on Nickel Catalyst Using Environmental Transmission Electron Microscopy. Small Methods. 2022; 6(6):e2200235. DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202200235. View

4.
Helveg S, Lopez-Cartes C, Sehested J, Hansen P, Clausen B, Rostrup-Nielsen J . Atomic-scale imaging of carbon nanofibre growth. Nature. 2004; 427(6973):426-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature02278. View

5.
Welling T, Watanabe K, Grau-Carbonell A, de Graaf J, Nagao D, Imhof A . Tunability of Interactions between the Core and Shell in Rattle-Type Particles Studied with Liquid-Cell Electron Microscopy. ACS Nano. 2021; 15(7):11137-11149. PMC: 8320242. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03140. View