» Articles » PMID: 37608855

The Polytrauma Patient: Current Concepts and Evolving Care

Overview
Journal OTA Int
Date 2023 Aug 23
PMID 37608855
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Principles of care in the polytraumatized patient have continued to evolve with advancements in technology. Although hemorrhage has remained a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in acute trauma, emerging strategies that can be applied pre-medical facility as well as in-hospital have continued to improve care. Exo-vascular modalities, including the use of devices to address torso hemorrhage and areas not amenable to traditional tourniquets, have revolutionized prehospital treatment. Endovascular advancements including the resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), have led to dramatic improvements in systolic blood pressure, although not without their own unique complications. Although novel treatment options have continued to emerge, so too have concepts regarding optimal time frames for intervention. Though prior care has focused on Injury Severity Score (ISS) as a marker to determine timing of intervention, current consensus contends that unnecessary delays in fracture care should be avoided, while respecting the complex physiology of certain patient groups that may remain at increased risk for complications. Thromboelastography (TEG) has been one technique that focuses on the unique pathophysiology of each patient, providing guidance for resuscitation in addition to providing information in recognizing the at-risk patient for venous thromboembolism. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has emerged as a therapeutic adjuvant for select trauma patients with significant soft tissue defects and open wounds. With significant advancements in medical technology and improved understanding of patient physiology, the optimal approach to the polytrauma patient continues to evolve.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in polytrauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dahms K, Ansems K, Dormann J, Steinfeld E, Janka H, Metzendorf M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):105.

PMID: 39945862 PMC: 11825575. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02789-8.


Immune dysfunction following severe trauma: A systems failure from the central nervous system to mitochondria.

Dobson G, Morris J, Letson H Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:968453.

PMID: 36111108 PMC: 9468749. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.968453.

References
1.
Tisherman S, Schmicker R, Brasel K, Bulger E, Kerby J, Minei J . Detailed description of all deaths in both the shock and traumatic brain injury hypertonic saline trials of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Ann Surg. 2014; 261(3):586-90. PMC: 4309746. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000837. View

2.
Spahn D, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats T, Duranteau J, Fernandez-Mondejar E . Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline. Crit Care. 2013; 17(2):R76. PMC: 4056078. DOI: 10.1186/cc12685. View

3.
Dukan R, Trousselier M, Briand S, Hamada S, Molina V, Court C . What are the differences in outcomes between simple and complicated FSF managed by early IMN?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 140(8):1037-1045. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03325-1. View

4.
Costa M, Achten J, Knight R, Bruce J, Dutton S, Madan J . Effect of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Deep Surgical Site Infection After Surgery for Lower Limb Fractures Associated With Major Trauma: The WHIST Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020; 323(6):519-526. PMC: 7042841. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0059. View

5.
Stannard J, Volgas D, Stewart R, McGwin Jr G, Alonso J . Negative pressure wound therapy after severe open fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23(8):552-7. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a2e2b6. View