Comparison of High-intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-intensity Continuous Training in Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Interstitial Lung Disease: a Randomised Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) compared with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for people with interstitial lung disease (ILD).
Design: Single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility, pilot trial.
Setting: Patients were recruited from the chest clinic of a tertiary ILD centre and attended circuit-based PR in the hospital's gym, followed by a personalised 6-month community programme.
Participants: 58 patients, stratified per ILD type, were randomised into two groups: 33 to HIIT (18 males:15 females) (mean age (SD): 70.2 (11.4) years) and 25 to the MICT exercise mode (14 males:11 females) (mean age (SD): 69.8 (10.8) years).
Interventions: 8-week, twice weekly, circuit-based PR programme of exercise and education, followed by a personalised 6-month community exercise programme.
Outcome Measures: Feasibility outcomes included staff-to-patient ratio and dropout rates per group. Primary outcome was the 6 min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes included the sniff nasal pressure, mouth inspiratory and expiratory pressures, handgrip and quadriceps strength and health status. Random-effects models were used to evaluate average variation in outcomes through time across the two groups.
Results: The 6MWD peaked earlier with HIIT compared with MICT (at 4 months vs 5 months) but values were lower at peak (mean (95% CI): 26.3 m (3.5 to 49.1) vs 51.6 m (29.2 to 73.9)) and declined faster at 6 months post-PR. Secondary outcomes showed similar faster but smaller improvements with HIIT over MICT and more consistent maintenance 6 months post-PR with MICT than HIIT.
Conclusions: HIIT is feasible in circuit-based ILD PR programmes and provides quick improvements but requires closer supervision of training and resources than MICT and benefits may be less well sustained. This would make it a less attractive option for clinical PR programmes. A definitive, multicentre randomised controlled trial is required to address the role of HIIT in ILD.
Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN55846300.
Otake K, Misu S, Yamamoto A, Yamaguchi T, Nagatani C, Sakai H Respir Care. 2025; 70(1):56-64.
PMID: 39964866 PMC: 11824878. DOI: 10.1089/respcare.11712.
Seleoglu I, Demirel A Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2024; 41(4):e2024061.
PMID: 39655592 PMC: 11708958. DOI: 10.36141/svdld.v41i4.15633.
Protected characteristics reported in pulmonary rehabilitation: a scoping review.
Drover H, Gardiner L, Singh S, Evans R, Daynes E, Orme M Eur Respir Rev. 2024; 33(172).
PMID: 39009405 PMC: 11262624. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0236-2023.