» Articles » PMID: 37605214

Investigation of the Effect of Rifampicin Resistance and Risk Factors on Recovery Rates After DAIR Procedure in Patients with Prosthetic Joint Infection

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Aug 22
PMID 37605214
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rifampicin plays a key role in the management of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), however, the emergence of rifampicin resistance is associated with less favourable clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of rifampicin resistance and other patient-related factors on recovery rates among patients with PJI undergoing debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR).

Methods: We reviewed medical records and microbiology reports of 67 patients (37 males and 30 females) undergoing DAIR due to PJI between 2014 and 2021. Patient-related factors, co-morbidities and microbiological reports were collected and reviewed. Forty-four patients had hip, 21 had knee, 1 had shoulder and 1 had elbow joint infection. Obtained data were statistically analysed with a logistic regression model.

Results: Rifampicin-sensitive organism was isolated in 47 cases. Recovery rate was 72.3% in the sensitive and 76.9% in the resistant group. We found no significant effect of rifampicin resistance on the probability of recovery. Age and diabetes mellitus showed negative clinical impact on recovery. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci were predominant in the rifampicin-sensitive (66.6% of the isolates) and Gram-negative rods in the resistant group (65.2%).

Conclusions: Based on our results, higher age and diabetes mellitus may have a clinically relevant negative impact on clinical outcome, however, this effect was not statistically significant. This may be due to the limited number of patients included in this study. We observed no clinically relevant effect of rifampicin-resistance, sex and body mass index (BMI) on recovery rates among patients undergoing DAIR due to PJI.

References
1.
Berbari E, Hanssen A, Duffy M, Steckelberg J, Ilstrup D, Harmsen W . Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 27(5):1247-54. DOI: 10.1086/514991. View

2.
Nikolaus O, McLendon P, Hanssen A, Mabry T, Berbari E, Sierra R . Factors Associated With 20-Year Cumulative Risk of Infection After Aseptic Index Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 31(4):872-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.025. View

3.
Samuel J, Gould F . Prosthetic joint infections: single versus combination therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 65(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp398. View

4.
Lowik C, Wagenaar F, van der Weegen W, Poolman R, Nelissen R, Bulstra S . LEAK study: design of a nationwide randomised controlled trial to find the best way to treat wound leakage after primary hip and knee arthroplasty. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(12):e018673. PMC: 5770823. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018673. View

5.
Costerton J, Montanaro L, Arciola C . Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs. 2005; 28(11):1062-8. DOI: 10.1177/039139880502801103. View