» Articles » PMID: 37605196

A Scoping Review of Remote Facilitation During Simulation-based Healthcare Education

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Aug 22
PMID 37605196
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Remote facilitation is a synchronous distance education method where instructors facilitate a lesson, in real-time, in physically separate conditions. In this scoping review, we aimed to describe types of remote facilitation used in a healthcare simulation, the influences on learner outcomes, and related factors.

Methods: We accessed PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, and Web of Science using our search strategies. Five reviewers performed the review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework, and the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines.

Results: We included a total of 29 articles presenting 28 simulation studies. The most common tool was videoconferencing (n = 26, 89.7%). Knowledge improvement was the most frequently measured outcome. There was no significant difference in learning outcomes between the two teaching modes. There were differences in learners' preferences and satisfaction with remote facilitators before and after COVID-19.

Conclusions: Our scoping review indicates that remote facilitation has been widely accepted in many healthcare professions using various types of simulation modalities. Remote facilitation can be used to overcome logistical problems of synchronous multi-location education, and to improve learner knowledge, skills, and confidence measured by instructor evaluation or self-assessment.

Citing Articles

The Use of Remote Learning Techniques for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Simulation Highlighting the Intersection Between Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Pathways.

Stokes S, Ismail L, Creamer K Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e74974.

PMID: 39744259 PMC: 11691595. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74974.


Facilitators' experiences with virtual simulation and their impact on learning.

Verkuyl M, Violato E, Southam T, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Goldsworthy S, MacEachern D Adv Simul (Lond). 2024; 9(1):54.

PMID: 39736675 PMC: 11686887. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-024-00323-1.

References
1.
Christensen M, Rieger K, Tan S, Dieckmann P, Ostergaard D, Watterson L . Remotely Versus Locally Facilitated Simulation-based Training in Management of the Deteriorating Patient by Newly Graduated Health Professionals: A Controlled Trial. Simul Healthc. 2015; 10(6):352-359. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000123. View

2.
Rose S . Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020; 323(21):2131-2132. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.5227. View

3.
Jewer J, Parsons M, Dunne C, Smith A, Dubrowski A . Evaluation of a Mobile Telesimulation Unit to Train Rural and Remote Practitioners on High-Acuity Low-Occurrence Procedures: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(8):e14587. PMC: 6701160. DOI: 10.2196/14587. View

4.
Peters M, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares C . Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):141-6. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. View

5.
Fung J, Zhang W, Yeung M, Pang M, Lam V, Chan B . Evaluation of students' perceived clinical competence and learning needs following an online virtual simulation education programme with debriefing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs Open. 2021; 8(6):3045-3054. PMC: 8441701. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1017. View