» Articles » PMID: 37601931

Assessment of Haemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation and Prone Positioning Following Clonidine and Enalaprilat in Lumbar Spine Surgeries: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2023 Aug 21
PMID 37601931
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: This study evaluates the effectiveness of long-acting antihypertensive drugs (clonidine and enalaprilat) in blunting the intubation response. Also, the study seeks to determine how effectively clonidine and enalaprilat can maintain stable haemodynamics during a change in position.

Methods: After ethical committee approval and trial registration, a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted with 71 consenting patients scheduled for elective spine surgery in a prone position under general anaesthesia. Group C received clonidine 2 μg/kg, and Group E received enalaprilat 1.25 mg diluted in normal saline as an intravenous infusion given over 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in response to the infusion of the study drugs, induction, tracheal intubation and change in position were recorded. value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.

Results: Clonidine infusion caused a significant fall in heart rate post-infusion and post-induction with propofol (p value <0.05). Both clonidine and enalaprilat caused a significant fall in mean arterial pressure (MAP) post-infusion and post-induction (p value <0.05). Clonidine effectively blunted the intubation response with no increase in HR and MAP following intubation. Enalaprilat caused a significant rise in HR in response to intubation. On proning, there was a significant fall in MAP in both groups.

Conclusion: Clonidine is effective in blunting the intubation response. Preoperative infusion of clonidine and enalaprilat causes hypotension during a change of position.

Citing Articles

Is research reporting intraoperative hypotension apt enough?.

Karim H, Bansal V Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(5):496-499.

PMID: 38764962 PMC: 11100658. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_209_24.

References
1.
Mahajan L, Kaur M, Gupta R, Aujla K, Singh A, Kaur A . Attenuation of the pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with intravenous dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate under bispectral index-controlled anaesthesia: A placebo-controlled prospective randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2018; 62(5):337-343. PMC: 5971621. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1_18. View

2.
Faisal M, Cawello W, Laeer S . Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Enalapril and Enalaprilat in Pediatric Patients-A Systematic Review. Front Pediatr. 2021; 9:611322. PMC: 7907604. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.611322. View

3.
Kwee M, Ho Y, Rozen W . The prone position during surgery and its complications: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Int Surg. 2015; 100(2):292-303. PMC: 4337445. DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00256.1. View

4.
Yagi A, Ichikawa S, Sakamaki T, Ono Z, Sato K, Nakamura T . Role of norepinephrine in the lack of reflex tachycardia after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1992; 166(4):429-37. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.166.429. View

5.
Jiwanmall M, Joselyn A, Kandasamy S . Intravenous clonidine as a part of balanced anaesthesia for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomised controled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017; 61(5):418-423. PMC: 5444221. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_58_17. View