» Articles » PMID: 37596320

A Positive Feedback Between Cholesterol Synthesis and the Pentose Phosphate Pathway Rather Than Glycolysis Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Oncogene
Date 2023 Aug 18
PMID 37596320
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hepatic cholesterol accumulation and hypercholesterolemia are implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the therapeutic effects of cholesterol-lowering drugs on HCC are controversial, indicating that the relationship between cholesterol metabolism and HCC is more complex than anticipated. A positive feedback between cholesterol synthesis and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) rather than glycolysis was formed in tumors of c-Myc mice. Blocking the PPP prevented cholesterol synthesis and thereby HCC in c-Myc mice, while ablating glycolysis did not affect cholesterol synthesis and failed to prevent c-Myc-induced HCC. Unexpectedly, HMGCR (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase) and G6PD (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase), the rate-limiting enzymes of cholesterol synthesis and the PPP, were identified as direct targets of microRNA-206. By targeting Hmgcr and G6pd, microRNA-206 disrupted the positive feedback and fully prevented HCC in c-Myc mice, while 100% of control mice died of HCC. Disrupting the interaction of microRNA-206 with Hmgcr and G6pd restored cholesterol synthesis, the PPP and HCC growth that was inhibited by miR-206. This study identified a previously undescribed positive feedback loop between cholesterol synthesis and the PPP, which drives HCC, while microRNA-206 prevents HCC by disrupting this loop. Cholesterol synthesis as a process rather than cholesterol itself is the major contributor of HCC.

Citing Articles

The Pentose Phosphate Pathway: From Mechanisms to Implications for Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Qiao J, Yu Z, Zhou H, Wang W, Wu H, Ye J Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859324 PMC: 11765532. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020610.


Mevalonate kinase inhibits anti-tumor immunity by impairing the tumor cell-intrinsic interferon response in microsatellite instability colorectal cancer.

Liao Y, Yang R, Wang B, Ruan Y, Cui L, Yang J Oncogene. 2024; .

PMID: 39725712 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-03255-2.


Loss of Carbamoyl Phosphate Synthetase 1 Potentiates Hepatocellular Carcinoma Metastasis by Reducing Aspartate Level.

Chen S, Tang Q, Hu M, Song S, Wu X, Zhou Y Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(45):e2402703.

PMID: 39387452 PMC: 11615744. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202402703.


Crosstalk between Epigenetics and Metabolic Reprogramming in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New Sight.

Li A, Wang R, Zhao Y, Zhao P, Yang J Metabolites. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38921460 PMC: 11205353. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14060325.


MicroRNA-206 as a potential cholesterol-lowering drug is superior to statins in mice.

Li C, Tian J, Liu N, Song D, Steer C, Han Q J Lipid Res. 2024; 65(7):100576.

PMID: 38866328 PMC: 11292365. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlr.2024.100576.


References
1.
Wang Y, Wu M, Sham J, Zhang W, Wu W, Guan X . Prognostic significance of c-myc and AIB1 amplification in hepatocellular carcinoma. A broad survey using high-throughput tissue microarray. Cancer. 2002; 95(11):2346-52. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10963. View

2.
Yi S, Kim S, Han K, Yi J, Ohrr H . Higher cholesterol levels, not statin use, are associated with a lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2019; 122(5):630-633. PMC: 7054540. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0691-3. View

3.
Tran K, McMenamin U, Coleman H, Cardwell C, Murchie P, Iversen L . Statin use and risk of liver cancer: Evidence from two population-based studies. Int J Cancer. 2019; 146(5):1250-1260. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32426. View

4.
Lunt S, Vander Heiden M . Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011; 27:441-64. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154237. View

5.
Rupaimoole R, Slack F . MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017; 16(3):203-222. DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246. View