» Articles » PMID: 37596314

A Pipeline for the Fully Automated Estimation of Continuous Reference Intervals Using Real-world Data

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Aug 18
PMID 37596314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reference intervals are essential for interpreting laboratory test results. Continuous reference intervals precisely capture physiological age-specific dynamics that occur throughout life, and thus have the potential to improve clinical decision-making. However, established approaches for estimating continuous reference intervals require samples from healthy individuals, and are therefore substantially restricted. Indirect methods operating on routine measurements enable the estimation of one-dimensional reference intervals, however, no automated approach exists that integrates the dependency on a continuous covariate like age. We propose an integrated pipeline for the fully automated estimation of continuous reference intervals expressed as a generalized additive model for location, scale and shape based on discrete model estimates using an indirect method (refineR). The results are free of subjective user-input, enable conversion of test results into z-scores and can be integrated into laboratory information systems. Comparison of our results to established and validated reference intervals from the CALIPER and PEDREF studies and manufacturers' package inserts shows good agreement of reference limits, indicating that the proposed pipeline generates high-quality results. In conclusion, the developed pipeline enables the generation of high-precision percentile charts and continuous reference intervals. It represents the first parameter-less and fully automated solution for the indirect estimation of continuous reference intervals.

References
1.
Adeli K, Higgins V, Trajcevski K, Palmert M . Important considerations for interpreting biochemical tests in children. BMJ. 2018; 361:k1950. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1950. View

2.
Giovanella L, Duntas L, DAurizio F, Kurka H, Ammer T, Rank C . How to approach clinically discordant FT4 results when changing testing platforms: real-world evidence. Endocrine. 2022; 77(2):333-339. PMC: 9325840. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03098-5. View

3.
Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Arzideh F, Zierk J, Gurr E, Streichert T . Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017; 55(3):341-347. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-1112. View

4.
Loh T, Antoniou G, Baghurst P, Metz M . Development of paediatric biochemistry centile charts as a complement to laboratory reference intervals. Pathology. 2014; 46(4):336-43. DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000118. View

5.
Horn P, Pesce A . Reference intervals: an update. Clin Chim Acta. 2003; 334(1-2):5-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(03)00133-5. View