» Articles » PMID: 37594970

Qualitative Study of In-kind Incentives to Improve Healthcare Quality in Belize: Is Quality Work Better Than Wealth?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Aug 18
PMID 37594970
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is a sparsity of knowledge of the specific mechanisms through which financial and non-financial incentives impact the performance of health teams. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by examining an in-kind incentives program for healthcare teams implemented in three districts in Belize (2012-2022) as part of the Salud Mesoamerica Initiative, which aimed to improve healthcare quality.

Methods: We performed a qualitative study to understand the mechanisms through which the in-kind incentive program supported quality improvement in Belize. We conducted key informant interviews (April-June 2021) remotely on a sample of former and current healthcare workers from Belize's Ministry of Health and Wellness familiar with the program. We analyzed responses using qualitative content analysis. We used open coding to identify patterns and themes.

Results: We conducted eight key informant interviews from a pool of thirty potential informants. Our analysis of the interviews yielded a total of 11 major themes with 27 subthemes. Most informants reported that in-kind incentives were not the primary motivation for improving their performance, though they did acknowledge that incentives had increased their attention on the quality of care provided. Conversely, we found that quarterly measurements and supportive supervision by national level authorities offered an external validation mechanism and instilled frontline staff with a sense of shared responsibility towards improving their performance. The majority of informants conveyed positive opinions about the in-kind incentives program.

Conclusions: Our study contributes to the understanding of how in-kind incentives can enhance performance. We found that in-kind incentives created extrinsic motivation, leading to an increased focus on quality. Standardized measurements and supportive supervision improved intrinsic motivation and formed a stronger commitment to quality of care. Rather than focusing on tangible incentives, explicitly incorporating standardized measurements and supportive supervision in the routine work of the Ministry of Health could have longer lasting effects on quality improvement.

References
1.
Doran T, Kontopantelis E, Valderas J, Campbell S, Roland M, Salisbury C . Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. BMJ. 2011; 342:d3590. PMC: 3125475. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3590. View

2.
Rios-Zertuche D, Zuniga-Brenes P, Palmisano E, Hernandez B, Schaefer A, Johanns C . Methods to measure quality of care and quality indicators through health facility surveys in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018; 31(3):183-190. PMC: 6464097. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy136. View

3.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

4.
Diaconu K, Falconer J, Verbel A, Fretheim A, Witter S . Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 5:CD007899. PMC: 8099148. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007899.pub3. View

5.
Kruk M, Gage A, Joseph N, Danaei G, Garcia-Saiso S, Salomon J . Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries. Lancet. 2018; 392(10160):2203-2212. PMC: 6238021. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4. View