» Articles » PMID: 37594600

Using EDNA to Understand Predator-prey Interactions Influenced by Invasive Species

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2023 Aug 18
PMID 37594600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Invasive predatory species may alter population dynamic processes of their prey and impact biological communities and ecosystem processes. Revealing biotic interactions, however, including the relationship between predator and prey, is a difficult task, in particular for species that are hard to monitor. Here, we present a case study that documents the utility of environmental DNA analysis (eDNA) to assess predator-prey interactions between two invasive fishes (Lepomis gibbosus, Pseudorasbora parva) and two potential amphibian prey species, (Triturus cristatus, Pelobates fuscus). We used species-specific TaqMan assays for quantitative assessment of eDNA concentrations from water samples collected from 89 sites across 31 ponds during three consecutive months from a local amphibian hotspot in Germany. We found a negative relationship between eDNA concentrations of the predators (fishes) and prey (amphibians) using Monte-Carlo tests. Our study highlights the potential of eDNA application to reveal predator-prey interactions and confirms the hypothesis that the observed local declines of amphibian species may be at least partly caused by recently introduced invasive fishes. Our findings have important consequences for local conservation management and highlight the usefulness of eDNA approaches to assess ecological interactions and guide targeted conservation action.

Citing Articles

Mosquitoes on a chip-environmental DNA-based detection of invasive mosquito species using high-throughput real-time PCR.

Wittwer C, Sharif C, Schock I, Klimpel S PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17782.

PMID: 39364359 PMC: 11448751. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17782.

References
1.
Harrison J, Sunday J, Rogers S . Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity. Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1915):20191409. PMC: 6892050. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1409. View

2.
Meyer A, Boyer F, Valentini A, Bonin A, Ficetola G, Beisel J . Morphological vs. DNA metabarcoding approaches for the evaluation of stream ecological status with benthic invertebrates: Testing different combinations of markers and strategies of data filtering. Mol Ecol. 2020; 30(13):3203-3220. DOI: 10.1111/mec.15723. View

3.
Sugihara G, May R, Ye H, Hsieh C, Deyle E, Fogarty M . Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science. 2012; 338(6106):496-500. DOI: 10.1126/science.1227079. View

4.
Thomsen P, Kielgast J, Iversen L, Rask Moller P, Rasmussen M, Willerslev E . Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e41732. PMC: 3430657. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041732. View

5.
Rohr J, Raffel T . Linking global climate and temperature variability to widespread amphibian declines putatively caused by disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(18):8269-74. PMC: 2889522. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912883107. View