» Articles » PMID: 37594519

2D Shear Wave Elastography for the Assessment of Quadriceps Entheses-a Methodological Study

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2023 Aug 18
PMID 37594519
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To establish the scanning protocol for 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (SWE) on normal entheses by investigating the possible confounding factors that may increase the variability of measured elasticity.

Material And Methods: 30 normal quadriceps entheses were scanned using SWE to compare the stiffness and coefficient variation by changing the ultrasonic coupling gel thickness, knee position, region of interest size, and scanning plane.

Results: No significant difference in median shear wave velocity (SWV) was observed in different coupling gel thicknesses. The median SWV was higher in the knee flexion position than in the extended position (p < 0.001). Increased knee flexion led to stiffer quadriceps enthesis and higher SWV (ρ = 0.8, p < 0.001). The median SWV was higher when the diameter region of interest was 4.0 mm than 2.0 mm (p = 0.001). The median SWV was higher in the transverse plane than in the longitudinal plane (p < 0.001). Strong correlation was found between SWV and the degree of the shear wave to muscle fiber direction (ρ = 0.8, p < 0.001). The coefficient variation was lower in a gel thickness of 2.5 cm, with an extended knee, a region of interest of 2.0 mm, and a longitudinal plane (p > 0.05). For interobserver reliability for the proposed protocol, the intraclass correlation coefficients was 0.763.

Conclusion: In this study, we determined supine position with the knee extended; using 2.0 mm diameter region of interest and image acquisition at the longitudinal plane with thicker layer coupling gel seems most appropriate to reliably image healthy quadriceps entheses with SWE.

Citing Articles

Application value of real-time shear wave elastography for quantitative evaluation of chronic kidney disease in pediatric patients.

Zhang J, Liu L, Yang F, Liu J Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(10):5595-5604.

PMID: 39544806 PMC: 11558424. DOI: 10.62347/YDHS2063.

References
1.
Zabotti A, Bandinelli F, Batticciotto A, Scire C, Iagnocco A, Sakellariou G . Musculoskeletal ultrasonography for psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis patients: a systematic literature review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017; 56(9):1518-1532. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex179. View

2.
Tang Y, Cheng S, Yang Y, Xiang X, Wang L, Zhang L . Ultrasound assessment in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis vulgaris (non-PsA): which sites are most commonly involved and what features are more important in PsA?. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020; 10(1):86-95. PMC: 6960435. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.08.09. View

3.
Eder L, Barzilai M, Peled N, Gladman D, Zisman D . The use of ultrasound for the assessment of enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis. Clin Radiol. 2012; 68(3):219-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.07.018. View

4.
Molina Collada J, Macia-Villa C, Plasencia C, Alvaro-Gracia J, De Miguel E . Doppler enthesitis: a potential useful outcome in the assessment of axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2020; 40(5):2013-2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05450-4. View

5.
Wervers K, Vis M, Rasappu N, van der Ven M, Tchetverikov I, Kok M . Modification of a sonographic enthesitis score to differentiate between psoriatic arthritis and young healthy volunteers. Scand J Rheumatol. 2018; 47(4):291-294. DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2017.1393695. View