» Articles » PMID: 37593519

What Are the Various Comprehensive Treatment Models to Improve Self-Efficacy and Self-Management in Adolescents with Diabetes Mellitus? A Scoping Review

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 18
PMID 37593519
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This review aimed to synthesize intervention models involving the role of adolescent and family support as part of comprehensive care to improve self-efficacy and self-management among adolescents with Diabetes Mellitus (DM).

Methods: A review was conducted to conform to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) standards. We searched PubMed, , databases, and grey literature. We included articles exploring family intervention models on improving self-efficacy and self-management among adolescents with DM, published from January 1, 2009, to June 30, 2022, and in English. Articles were declared eligible, reviewed critically, and then synthesized narratively.

Results: We identified 487 abstracts and title records from the initial search and excluded 409 irrelevant studies. Sixty-six full-text articles were screened, and nine were included in the synthesis. Five articles presented findings from using models focusing on child and adolescent intervention, while in the remaining four articles, the intervention models involved adolescents and their caregivers or parents. Only two models provide comprehensive care that requires collaboration among healthcare providers, patients, and families. Adolescent self-efficacy and self-management schemes as intermediary variables are closely related to everything that can influence health behavior, metabolic control, and quality of life for adolescents, which requires support from a multidisciplinary collaborative team.

Conclusion: Excellent comprehensive care team collaboration involving family support is essential to increase the self-efficacy and self-management of adolescents with DM.

References
1.
Hood K, Iturralde E, Rausch J, Weissberg-Benchell J . Preventing Diabetes Distress in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Results 1 Year After Participation in the STePS Program. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(8):1623-1630. PMC: 6054495. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-2556. View

2.
Kristensen L, Birkebaek N, Mose A, Jensen M, Thastum M . Multi-informant path models of the influence of psychosocial and treatment-related variables on adherence and metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0204176. PMC: 6147740. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204176. View

3.
Lawton J, Blackburn M, Allen J, Campbell F, Elleri D, Leelarathna L . Patients' and caregivers' experiences of using continuous glucose monitoring to support diabetes self-management: qualitative study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018; 18(1):12. PMC: 5819241. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-018-0239-1. View

4.
Shah A, Zeitler P, Wong J, Pena A, Wicklow B, Arslanian S . ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022; 23(7):872-902. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13409. View

5.
Croom A, Wiebe D, Berg C, Lindsay R, Donaldson D, Foster C . Adolescent and parent perceptions of patient-centered communication while managing type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010; 36(2):206-15. PMC: 3042600. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq072. View