» Articles » PMID: 37592215

A Survey of Surgical Patients' Perspectives and Preferences Towards General Anesthesia Techniques and Shared-decision Making

Abstract

Background: The decision about which type of general anesthetic to administer is typically made by the clinical team without patient engagement. This study examined patients' preferences, experiences, attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, and perceived social norms about anesthesia and about engaging in the decision regarding general anesthetic choice with their clinician.

Methods: We conducted a survey in the United States, sent to a panel of surgical patients through Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) from March 2022 through May 2022. Questions were developed based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and validated measures were used when available. A patient partner who had experienced both intravenous and inhaled anesthesia contributed to the development and refinement of the questions.

Results: A total of 806 patients who received general anesthesia for an elective procedure in the last five years completed the survey. 43% of respondents preferred a patient-led decision making role and 28% preferred to share decision making with their clinical team, yet only 7.8% reported being engaged in full shared decision making about the anesthesia they received. Intraoperative awareness, pain, nausea, vomiting and quickly returning to work and usual household activities were important to respondents. Waking up in the middle of surgery was the most commonly reported concern, despite this experience being reported only 8% of the time. Most patients (65%) who searched for information about general anesthesia noted that it took a lot of effort to find the information, and 53% agreed to feeling frustrated during the search.

Conclusions: Most patients prefer a patient-led or shared decision making process when it comes to their anesthetic care and want to be engaged in the decision. However, only a small percentage of patients reported being fully engaged in the decision. Further studies should inform future shared decision-making tools, informed consent materials, educational materials and framing of anesthetic choices for patients so that they are able to make a choice regarding the anesthetic they receive.

Citing Articles

Environmental and patient safety outcomes of a health-system Green Anesthesia Initiative (GAIA): a retrospective observational cohort study.

Colquhoun D, Hovord D, Rachel R, Yuan Y, Mentz G, Koppera P Lancet Planet Health. 2025; 9(2):e124-e133.

PMID: 39986316 PMC: 11881991. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00331-0.


Refining, implementing, and evaluating an anesthesia choice conversation aid for older adults with hip fracture: protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

Goldstein E, Politi M, Baraldi J, Elwyn G, Campos H, Feng R Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):97.

PMID: 39267183 PMC: 11396076. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00635-3.


Enhanced perioperative communication elevates patients' understanding, perception, and satisfaction for anesthesia services: Insights from a survey study.

Jaju R, Varshney S, Bihani P, Paliwal N, Karim H, Bhuyan D Saudi J Anaesth. 2024; 18(3):376-387.

PMID: 39149746 PMC: 11323907. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_104_24.


Mortality and morbidity after total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kampman J, Hermanides J, Hollmann M, Gilhuis C, Bloem W, Schraag S EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 72:102636.

PMID: 38774674 PMC: 11106536. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102636.


Description of the Content and Quality of Publicly Available Information on the Internet About Inhaled Volatile Anesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia: Descriptive Study.

Hu X, Pennington B, Avidan M, Kheterpal S, deBourbon N, Politi M JMIR Perioper Med. 2023; 6:e47714.

PMID: 37917148 PMC: 10654911. DOI: 10.2196/47714.

References
1.
Berlin N, Kirch M, Singer D, Solway E, Malani P, Kullgren J . Preoperative Concerns of Older US Adults and Decisions About Elective Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(1):e2353857. PMC: 10828908. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53857. View

2.
Epstein R, Gramling R . What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Med Care Res Rev. 2012; 70(1 Suppl):94S-112S. DOI: 10.1177/1077558712459216. View

3.
Williams C, Miller-Sonet E, Nipp R, Kamal A, Love S, Rocque G . Importance of quality-of-life priorities and preferences surrounding treatment decision making in patients with cancer and oncology clinicians. Cancer. 2020; 126(15):3534-3541. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32961. View

4.
Conti D, Ballo P, Boccalini R, Boccherini A, Cantini S, Venni A . The effect of patient sex on the incidence of early adverse effects in a population of elderly patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014; 42(4):455-9. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1404200405. View

5.
Myles P, McLeod A, Hunt J, Fletcher H . Sex differences in speed of emergence and quality of recovery after anaesthesia: cohort study. BMJ. 2001; 322(7288):710-1. PMC: 30098. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.710. View