» Articles » PMID: 37591286

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Single Crowns or Short Fixed Partial Dentures Supported by Short (≤6 mm) Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Eur J Dent
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Aug 17
PMID 37591286
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Long-term clinical outcomes of short dental implants (≤6 mm) supporting single crowns or short fixed partial dentures have been reported differently in different studies and need more clarification. This systematic study evaluated the rate of bone loss (BL), the durability of implants equal to or shorter than 6 mm supporting single crowns or short fixed partial dentures, and prosthetic-related side effects during 5 years of follow-up. Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) were electronically and manually searched for longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of 5 years or more until January 2023. The study question was, "Does the implant equal to or shorter than 6 mm affect BL and survival rate of the implant-supported prosthesis after 5 years of follow-up?". From 752 identified articles, nine studies were selected for further evaluation. After 5 years of follow-up, most studies had more than 90% survival rate and the maximum BL was 0.54 mm. Still, in internal and external connections, these changes were not substantial. For example, screw loosening was the most common problem with implanted prostheses. Implants of 6 mm or shorter are a suitable treatment option in atrophic ridges with good durability and fewer side effects during a follow-up period of more than 5 years.

Citing Articles

Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anitua E, Montalvillo A, Eguia A, Alkhraisat M Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39329858 PMC: 11431532. DOI: 10.3390/dj12090292.


Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants (≤6 mm) Used as an Alternative to Longer (>6 mm) Implants for the Rehabilitation of Posterior Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review of RCTs.

Emfietzoglou R, Dereka X Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38920886 PMC: 11202938. DOI: 10.3390/dj12060185.

References
1.
von Allmen R, Weiss S, Tevaearai H, Kuemmerli C, Tinner C, Carrel T . Completeness of Follow-Up Determines Validity of Study Findings: Results of a Prospective Repeated Measures Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140817. PMC: 4607456. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140817. View

2.
Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O . Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15(4):401-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01022.x. View

3.
Felice P, Barausse C, Pistilli V, Piattelli M, Ippolito D, Esposito M . Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018; 11(2):175-187. View

4.
Guida L, Annunziata M, Esposito U, Sirignano M, Torrisi P, Cecchinato D . 6-mm-short and 11-mm-long implants compared in the full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 3-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 31(1):64-73. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13547. View

5.
Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Minciarelli A, Leone M, Viola P, Esposito M . Early implant loading in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-stage lateral versus crestal sinus lift and 8 mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A 5-year randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013; 6(1):13-25. View