» Articles » PMID: 37588390

Learner-driven Innovation in the Stone Tool Technology of Early

Overview
Journal Evol Hum Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Aug 17
PMID 37588390
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current perspectives of stone tool technology tend to emphasize homogeneity in tool forms and core reduction strategies across time and space. This homogeneity is understood to represent shared cultural traditions that are passed down through the generations. This represents a top-down perspective on how and why stone tools are manufactured that largely restricts technological agency to experts, adults and teachers. However, just as bottom-up processes driven by children and youth influence technological innovation today, they are likely to have played a role in the past. This paper considers evidence from the archaeological record of early ' lithic technology in Africa that may attest to our long history of bottom-up social learning processes and learner-driven innovation. This evidence includes the role of emulative social learning in generating assemblages with diverse reduction strategies, a high degree of technological fragmentation across southern Africa during some time periods, and technological convergence through the Pleistocene. Counter to some perspectives on the uniqueness of our species, our ability to learn independently, to 'break the rules' and to play, as opposed to conforming to top-down influences, may also account for our technological success.

Citing Articles

Veiled agency? Children, innovation and the archaeological record.

Sterelny K Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 3:e12.

PMID: 37588545 PMC: 10427270. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2021.9.


Children and innovation: play, play objects and object play in cultural evolution.

Riede F, Walsh M, Nowell A, Langley M, Johannsen N Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 3:e11.

PMID: 37588535 PMC: 10427281. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2021.7.

References
1.
Soriano S, Villa P, Delagnes A, Degano I, Pollarolo L, Lucejko J . The Still Bay and Howiesons Poort at Sibudu and Blombos: Understanding Middle Stone Age Technologies. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0131127. PMC: 4498762. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131127. View

2.
Morgan T, Uomini N, Rendell L, Chouinard-Thuly L, Street S, Lewis H . Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:6029. PMC: 4338549. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7029. View

3.
Mcbrearty S, Brooks A . The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. J Hum Evol. 2000; 39(5):453-563. DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0435. View

4.
Langley M, Benitez-Burraco A, Kempe V . Playing with language, creating complexity: Has play contributed to the evolution of complex language?. Evol Anthropol. 2019; 29(1):29-40. DOI: 10.1002/evan.21810. View

5.
Adler D, Wilkinson K, Blockley S, Mark D, Pinhasi R, Schmidt-Magee B . Early Levallois technology and the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus. Science. 2014; 345(6204):1609-13. DOI: 10.1126/science.1256484. View