» Articles » PMID: 37587931

Market Integration, Income Inequality, and Kinship System Among the Mosuo of China

Overview
Journal Evol Hum Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Aug 17
PMID 37587931
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increased access to defensible material wealth is hypothesised to escalate inequality. Market integration, which creates novel opportunities in cash economies, provides a means of testing this hypothesis. Using demographic data collected from 505 households among the matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo in 2017, we test whether market integration is associated with increased material wealth, whether increased material wealth is associated with wealth inequality, and whether being in a matrilineal vs. patrilineal kinship system alters the relationship between wealth and inequality. We find evidence that market integration, measured as distance to the nearest source of tourism and primary source of household income, is associated with increased household income and 'modern' asset value. Both village-level market integration and mean asset value were associated negatively, rather than positively, with inequality, contrary to predictions. Finally, income, modern wealth and inequality were higher in matrilineal communities that were located closer to the centre of tourism and where tourism has long provided a relatively stable source of income. However, we also observed exacerbated inequality with increasing farm animal value in patriliny. We conclude that the forces affecting wealth and inequality depend on local context and that the importance of local institutions is obscured by aggregate statistics drawn from modern nation states.

Citing Articles

A rapid decline in gender bias relates to changes in subsistence practices over demographic changes in a formerly matrilineal community.

Huang Y, Bai P, Zhou L, Mace R, Du J iScience. 2025; 28(2):111926.

PMID: 40034119 PMC: 11872634. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111926.


Measuring perceived fitness interdependence between humans and non-humans.

Lee K, Hare D, Blossey B Evol Hum Sci. 2024; 6:e16.

PMID: 38572224 PMC: 10988171. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2024.10.


Gendered conflict in the human family.

Lawson D, Alami S, Somefun O Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 5:e12.

PMID: 37587929 PMC: 10426121. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2023.8.


Gender disparities in material and educational resources differ by kinship system.

Mattison S, Mattison P, Beheim B, Liu R, Blumenfield T, Sum C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1883):20220299.

PMID: 37381853 PMC: 10291433. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0299.


Does gender structure social networks across domains of cooperation? An exploration of gendered networks among matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo.

Mattison S, MacLaren N, Sum C, Shenk M, Blumenfield T, Wander K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 378(1868):20210436.

PMID: 36440564 PMC: 9703220. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0436.

References
1.
Mattison S, Beheim B, Chak B, Buston P . Offspring sex preferences among patrilineal and matrilineal Mosuo in Southwest China revealed by differences in parity progression. R Soc Open Sci. 2016; 3(9):160526. PMC: 5043333. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160526. View

2.
Shennan S . Property and wealth inequality as cultural niche construction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366(1566):918-26. PMC: 3048998. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0309. View

3.
Mattison S, Quinlan R, Hare D . The expendable male hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019; 374(1780):20180080. PMC: 6664138. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0080. View

4.
Brown G, Laland K, Borgerhoff Mulder M . Bateman's principles and human sex roles. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 24(6):297-304. PMC: 3096780. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005. View

5.
Hackman J, Kramer K . Balancing fertility and livelihood diversity in mixed economies. PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0253535. PMC: 8224957. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253535. View