» Articles » PMID: 37585480

Comparison of Thromboembolism Outcomes in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Prescribed Hormonal Contraception

Overview
Journal Blood Adv
Specialty Hematology
Date 2023 Aug 16
PMID 37585480
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at a risk of thromboembolism (TE), and use of hormonal contraception can further increase that risk. This study aims to assess patterns of hormonal contraceptive use and compare risk of contraception-related TE between combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) and progestin-only contraceptives (POCs). Patients with SCD aged between 12 and 44 years with a new prescription of a hormonal contraceptive in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicaid Analytic eXtract database (2006-2018) were followed up to 1 year. We identified 7173 new users: 44.6% initiated CHC and 55.4% initiated POC. Combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs; 36.5%) and progestin-only depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (33.9%) were the most frequently prescribed agents. A total of 1.8% of contraception users had a new diagnosis of TE within 1 year of the first identified contraception prescription. There were no significant differences in TE event rates between CHC and POC users (17.2 and 24.7 events per 1000 person-years, respectively). In patients prescribed OCP, there were no differences in TE event rates based on estrogen dose or progestin generation. Transdermal patch had a 2.4-fold increased risk of TE as compared with that of OCP. Although limited by the retrospective study design and use of administrative claims data, this study found no significant differences in TE rates between new users of CHC and POC in patients with SCD. Careful evaluation of underlying TE risk factors should be considered for each patient with SCD before initiation of hormonal contraception.

Citing Articles

Disease severity drives risk of venous thrombotic events in women with sickle cell disease in a single-center retrospective study.

Light J, Abrams C, Ilich A, Huang S, Zhu H, Baskin-Miller J Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(4):102471.

PMID: 39099800 PMC: 11295566. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102471.

References
1.
Lidegaard O, Lokkegaard E, Svendsen A, Agger C . Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2890. PMC: 2726928. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2890. View

2.
Smith-Whitley K . Complications in pregnant women with sickle cell disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019; 2019(1):359-366. PMC: 6913482. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2019000039. View

3.
Cole J, Norman H, Doherty M, Walker A . Venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke among transdermal contraceptive system users. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109(2 Pt 1):339-46. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000250968.82370.04. View

4.
Daniels K, Abma J . Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019. NCHS Data Brief. 2020; (388):1-8. View

5.
Scholes D, LaCroix A, Ichikawa L, Barlow W, Ott S . Injectable hormone contraception and bone density: results from a prospective study. Epidemiology. 2002; 13(5):581-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200209000-00015. View