» Articles » PMID: 37584856

Understanding Ultrasound Features That Predict Symptom Severity in Patients with Adenomyosis: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Reprod Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Aug 16
PMID 37584856
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adenomyosis is associated with pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Several ultrasound-based classifications have been reported, but it is not clear which criteria reflect the severity of symptoms. The aim of this review is to summarize the ultrasound features that correlate with clinical manifestations of adenomyosis and to discuss diagnostic methods for predicting disease severity. A literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar published up to March 2022 was performed. A consensus-based classification was determined primarily by defining the mapping or topography of the lesion. Ultrasound features can be classified into direct (i.e., the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium) and indirect findings (i.e., changes in the myometrial structure and translesional vascularity secondary to myometrial invasion). There are some reports that symptoms are positively correlated with the location and spread of the disease. Indeed, the lesion thickness, diffuse or internal adenomyosis, and focal adenomyosis may be associated with increased risks of dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility, respectively. Two ultrasound markers (i.e., the presence of heterogeneous myometrium and myometrial cysts) appear to be the criteria most clinicians focus on. However, decision-making on treatment necessity is determined by symptom severity rather than the topography of the lesions. There is currently no consensus that symptom severity can be predicted based on ultrasound features, but the ultrasound-based criteria may be helpful in diagnosing adenomyosis.

Citing Articles

Abnormal uterine bleeding: The well-known and the hidden face.

Leal C, Vannuccini S, Jain V, Dolmans M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Al-Hendy A J Endometr Uterine Disord. 2024; 6.

PMID: 38764520 PMC: 11101194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeud.2024.100071.

References
1.
Ferenczy A . Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998; 4(4):312-22. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/4.4.312. View

2.
Protopapas A, Grimbizis G, Athanasiou S, Loutradis D . Adenomyosis: Disease, uterine aging process leading to symptoms, or both?. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020; 12(2):91-104. PMC: 7431194. View

3.
Harmsen M, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw R, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L . Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 60(1):118-131. PMC: 9328356. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24786. View

4.
Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone F, Valentin L, Rasmussen C, Votino A . Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46(3):284-98. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14806. View

5.
Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn A, de Leeuw R, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L . Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 53(5):576-582. DOI: 10.1002/uog.19096. View