» Articles » PMID: 37584773

Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Breast Reconstruction: a Large Single-institution Evaluation of Surgical Outcome and Complications

Abstract

Purpose: The use of autologous tissues is considered gold standard for patients undergoing breast reconstruction and is the preferred method in the post-radiation setting. Although the latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) has been replaced by abdominal flaps as technique of choice, it remains a valuable option in several specific clinical situations and its use has been regaining popularity in recent years. In this work, we present an 18-year retrospective analysis of a single-institution single-surgeon experience with LDF-based reconstruction with focus on early complications and reconstructive failures.

Methods: Hospital records of all patients undergoing breast surgery for any reason in the Certified Breast Cancer Center, Regio Klinikum Pinneberg, Germany between April, 1st 2005 and October, 31st 2022 were reviewed. 142 consecutive LDF-based reconstructive procedures were identified. Detailed information was gathered on patient characteristics, treatment-related factors, and complications.

Results: One hundred forty patients (139 female, 1 male) received 142 LDF-based surgeries. The flap was used mainly for immediate breast reconstruction with or without implant (83% of patients), followed by defect coverage after removal of a large tumor (7%), implant-to-flap conversion with or without placement of a new implant (6%), and delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction (4%). The use of LDF decreased between 2005 and 2020 (2005: 17, 2006: 13, 2007: 14, 2008: 16, 2009: 5, 2010: 9, 2011: 8, 2012: 3, 2013: 10, 2014: 8, 2015: 8, 2016: 7, 2017: 7, 2018: 4, 2019: 4, 2020: 2, 2021: 6, 2022: 4). Surgery was performed for invasive breast cancer in 78%, ductal carcinoma in situ in 20% and other reasons such as genetic mutation in 1% of patients. Ipsilateral radiation therapy was received by 12% of patients prior to LDF surgery and by 37% after the surgery. 25% of patients were smokers. The median duration of surgery, including all procedures conducted simultaneously such as e.g., mastectomy, axillary surgery, or implant placement, was 117 min (range 56-205). Patients stayed in the hospital for a median of 7 days (range 2-23 days). The most common complication was seroma (26%), followed by wound dehiscence (8%), surgical site infection (7%), partial skin and/or nipple necrosis of any size (7%) and hematoma requiring surgical evacuation (2%). 19% of all patients required seroma aspiration or drainage, mostly at the donor site and performed under ultrasound guidance in the ambulatory setting. Flap loss due to necrosis occurred in 2% of patients.

Conclusions: Latissimus dorsi flap is a well-established surgical technique commonly used for immediate breast reconstruction as well as defect coverage in locally advanced breast cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest single-surgeon analyses of early complications in patients receiving LDF. As expected, seroma was the most common complication observed in nearly one third of patients and requiring a therapeutic intervention in every fifth patient. Serious adverse events occurred rarely, and flap loss rate was very low.

Citing Articles

Assessing Donor Site Morbidity and Impact on Quality of Life in Free Flap Microsurgery: An Overview.

Hodea F, Hariga C, Bordeanu-Diaconescu E, Cretu A, Dumitru C, Ratoiu V Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39859976 PMC: 11766666. DOI: 10.3390/life15010036.


Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap as a Therapeutic Option in Breast Reconstructive Surgery: A Case Report.

Villarreal-Salgado J, Ortega-Fernandez A, Montenegro Jimenez C, Carballar Mejia F, Vazquez-Lara S Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69481.

PMID: 39416586 PMC: 11479999. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69481.


A Meta-analysis Comparing Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps and Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Breast Reconstruction.

Tanas Y, Tanas J, Swed S, Spiegel A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(10):e6206.

PMID: 39386099 PMC: 11463201. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006206.


Chest wall perforator flap partial breast reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of surgical, cosmetic and survival outcome.

Agrawal S, Mahajan S, Ahmed R, Shruti N, Sharma A Ecancermedicalscience. 2024; 18:1681.

PMID: 38566767 PMC: 10984835. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1681.


Symptomatic Calcifications after Mastectomy: A Rare Case Report with a Review of the Literature.

Zatecky J, Coufal O, Sekret D, Peteja M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(3).

PMID: 38541125 PMC: 10971971. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60030399.

References
1.
Clarke-Pearson E, Lin A, Hertl C, Austen W, Colwell A . Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137(6):1690-1699. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002173. View

2.
Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, Lee G, Curtin C . Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J. 2013; 19(5):463-9. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12148. View

3.
Menke H, Erkens M, Olbrisch R . Evolving concepts in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: results and follow-up of 121 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2001; 47(2):107-14. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200108000-00001. View

4.
Giacalone P, Rathat G, Daures J, Benos P, Azria D, Rouleau C . New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 122(2):439-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0951-7. View

5.
Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller H, Friese K . Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: improved aesthetic results after transection of its humeral insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103(7):1876-81. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199906000-00011. View