» Articles » PMID: 37584757

Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Development and Evaluation for MRI Diagnosis of Knee Ligament or Meniscus Tears

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2023 Aug 16
PMID 37584757
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the results of original research studies evaluating the characteristics and performance of deep learning models for detection of knee ligament and meniscus tears on MRI.

Materials And Methods: We searched PubMed for studies published as of February 2, 2022 for original studies evaluating development and evaluation of deep learning models for MRI diagnosis of knee ligament or meniscus tears. We summarized study details according to multiple criteria including baseline article details, model creation, deep learning details, and model evaluation.

Results: 19 studies were included with radiology departments leading the publications in deep learning development and implementation for detecting knee injuries via MRI. Among the studies, there was a lack of standard reporting and inconsistently described development details. However, all included studies reported consistently high model performance that significantly supplemented human reader performance.

Conclusion: From our review, we found radiology departments have been leading deep learning development for injury detection on knee MRIs. Although studies inconsistently described DL model development details, all reported high model performance, indicating great promise for DL in knee MRI analysis.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: realistic clinical applications in the next decade.

Ruitenbeek H, Oei E, Visser J, Kijowski R Skeletal Radiol. 2024; 53(9):1849-1868.

PMID: 38902420 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04684-6.


A Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Learning Models on Knee MRIs for the Diagnosis and Classification of Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Botnari A, Kadar M, Patrascu J Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893617 PMC: 11172202. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111090.


The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Andriollo L, Picchi A, Sangaletti R, Perticarini L, Rossi S, Logroscino G Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38338185 PMC: 10855330. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030300.


Use of artificial intelligence in the field of pain medicine.

Chang M World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(2):236-239.

PMID: 38313631 PMC: 10835690. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i2.236.

References
1.
Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans C . Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(5):267-88. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2011. View

2.
Mulligan E, Harwell J, Robertson W . Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the Lachman test performed in a prone position. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41(10):749-57. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3761. View

3.
Rosenkrantz A, Hughes D, Duszak Jr R . The U.S. Radiologist Workforce: An Analysis of Temporal and Geographic Variation by Using Large National Datasets. Radiology. 2015; 279(1):175-84. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150921. View

4.
Mollura D, Culp M, Pollack E, Battino G, Scheel J, Mango V . Artificial Intelligence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Innovating Global Health Radiology. Radiology. 2020; 297(3):513-520. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020201434. View

5.
Langerhuizen D, Janssen S, Mallee W, van den Bekerom M, Ring D, Kerkhoffs G . What Are the Applications and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Fracture Detection and Classification in Orthopaedic Trauma Imaging? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(11):2482-2491. PMC: 6903838. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000848. View