Impact of Virtual Education on Urology Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview

Journal Can Urol Assoc J

Specialty Urology

Date 2023 Aug 15

PMID 37581553

Authors

Jesse T R Spooner

Wyatt MacNevin

John Grantmyre

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic changed the way urology education was delivered. At Dalhousie University, third-year medical students (clinical clerks) undergoing a two-week urology elective had the historic in-person seminars changed to virtual seminars with pre-recorded lectures by staff. The academic abilities of the clerks were measured via a standardized written exam and clinical score assigned by a staff preceptor. This study aimed to measure the impact of virtual education on student performance.

Methods: Clerk clinical and exam scores have been recorded since 2014. The in-person seminar (pre-COVID) cohort included students from January 2014 to March 2020 (n=109), while the virtual seminar (post-COVID) cohort was recorded from April 2020 to August 2022 (n=60). Independent t-test was used to compare clinical, exam, and total scores between the pre-COVID student groups after ensuring normality.

Results: Students in the virtual seminar group (mean ± standard deviation 88.69±6.50%) performed better than the in-person seminar student groups (86.32±6.33%) in terms of clinical performance gradings (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in written exam scores between the in-person seminar and virtual seminar cohorts (77.34±10.94% vs. 78.75±11.37%, p=0.43). Cumulative scores were higher for virtual seminar student groups vs. in-person seminar cohort (86.70±5.40% vs. 84.52±5.44%, p=0.01).

Conclusions: Clinical clerks undergoing virtual education during a two-week urology elective had improved clinical and cumulative score performances when compared to the in-personal seminar cohort; virtual seminars did not statistically negatively impact exam scores.

References

Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos M, Hanrahan J, Janga D, Dedeilias P, Sideris M . Medical and Surgical Education Challenges and Innovations in the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review. In Vivo. 2020; 34(3 Suppl):1603-1611. PMC: 8378024. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11950. View

Abi-Rafeh J, Azzi A . Emerging role of online virtual teaching resources for medical student education in plastic surgery: COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020; 73(8):1575-1592. PMC: 7256619. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.085. View

Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H . COVID-19 and medical education. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(7):777-778. PMC: 7270510. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30226-7. View

Ahmady S, Shahbazi S, Heidari M . Transition to Virtual Learning During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Crisis in Iran: Opportunity Or Challenge?. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020; 14(3):e11-e12. PMC: 7264447. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.142. View

Sleiwah A, Mughal M, Hachach-Haram N, Roblin P . COVID-19 lockdown learning: The uprising of virtual teaching. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020; 73(8):1575-1592. PMC: 7244437. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.032. View

Chen B, Kern D, Kearns R, Thomas P, Hughes M, Tackett S . From Modules to MOOCs: Application of the Six-Step Approach to Online Curriculum Development for Medical Education. Acad Med. 2019; 94(5):678-685. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002580. View

Wilcha R . Effectiveness of Virtual Medical Teaching During the COVID-19 Crisis: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2020; 6(2):e20963. PMC: 7682786. DOI: 10.2196/20963. View

Sahi P, Mishra D, Singh T . Medical Education Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian Pediatr. 2020; 57(7):652-657. PMC: 7387262. View

Murdock H, Penner J, Le S, Nematollahi S . Virtual Morning Report during COVID-19: A novel model for case-based teaching conferences. Med Educ. 2020; 54(9):851-852. PMC: 7273056. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14226. View

10.

Daniels K, Arafeh J, Clark A, Waller S, Druzin M, Chueh J . Prospective randomized trial of simulation versus didactic teaching for obstetrical emergencies. Simul Healthc. 2010; 5(1):40-5. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181b65f22. View

11.

Geha R, Dhaliwal G . Pilot virtual clerkship curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic: Podcasts, peers and problem-solving. Med Educ. 2020; 54(9):855-856. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14246. View

12.

Pickering J, Henningsohn L, DeRuiter M, de Jong P, Reinders M . Twelve tips for developing and delivering a massive open online course in medical education. Med Teach. 2017; 39(7):691-696. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1322189. View

13.

Skinner T, Ho L, Touma N . Study habits of Canadian urology residents: Implications for development of a competence by design curriculum. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017; 11(3-4):83-87. PMC: 5433965. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4132. View

14.

Visingardi J, Inouye B, Feustel P, Kogan B . Variability in Third-Year Medical Student Clerkship Grades. J Urol. 2022; 208(5):952-954. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002926. View

15.

Ding M, Wang Y, Braga L, Matsumoto E . Urology education in the time of COVID-19. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020; 14(6):E231-E232. PMC: 7654678. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6696. View

16.

Kaup S, Jain R, Shivalli S, Pandey S, Kaup S . Sustaining academics during COVID-19 pandemic: The role of online teaching-learning. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020; 68(6):1220-1221. PMC: 7508127. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1241_20. View

17.

Henningsohn L, Dastaviz N, Stathakarou N, McGrath C . KIUrologyX: Urology As You Like It-A Massive Open Online Course for Medical Students, Professionals, Patients, and Laypeople Alike. Eur Urol. 2017; 72(3):321-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.034. View