» Articles » PMID: 37581045

Native T Mapping for Non-invasive Quantitative Evaluation of Renal Function and Renal Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Aug 15
PMID 37581045
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To investigate the role of native T mapping in the non-invasive quantitative assessment of renal function and renal fibrosis (RF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

Methods: A prospective analysis of 71 consecutive patients [no RF (0%): 9 cases; mild RF (<25%): 36 cases; moderate RF (25-50%): 17 cases; severe RF (>50%): 9 cases] who were clinically diagnosed with CKD that was pathologically confirmed and who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination between October 2021 and September 2022 was performed. T-C (mean cortical T value), T-M (mean medullary T value), ΔT (mean corticomedullary difference) and T% (mean corticomedullary ratio) values were compared. Correlations between T parameters and clinical and histopathological values were analyzed. Regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of RF. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of RF.

Results: The T-C, ΔT and T% values (P<0.05) were significantly different in the CKD group, but T-M was not (P>0.05). The ΔT and T% values showed significant differences in pairwise comparisons among CKD subgroups (P<0.05) except for CKD 2 and 3. ΔT and T% were moderately correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔT: r=-0.561; T%: r=-0.602), serum creatinine (ΔT: r=0.591; T%: r=0.563), blood urea nitrogen (ΔT: r=0.433; T%: r=0.435) and histopathological score (ΔT: r=0.630; T%: r=0.658). ΔT and T%, but not T-C, were independent predictors of RF (P<0.05). ΔT and T% were set as -410.07 ms and 0.8222 with great specificity [ΔT: 91.7% (77.5-98.2%); T%: 97.2% (85.5-99.9%)] to identify mild RF and moderate-severe RF. The optimal cutoff values for differentiating severe RF from mild-moderate RF were -343.81 ms (ΔT) and 0.8359 (T%) with high sensitivity [both 100% (66.4-100%)] and specificity [ΔT: 90.6% (79.3-96.9%); T%: 94.3% (84.3-98.8%)].

Conclusions: ΔT and T% overwhelm T-C for assessment of renal function and RF in CKD patients. ΔT and T% identify patients with <25% and >50% fibrosis, which can guide clinical decision-making and help to avoid biopsy-related bleeding.

Citing Articles

Potential MRI Biomarkers for Predicting Kidney Function and Histological Damage in Transplanted Deceased Donor Kidney Recipients.

Bura A, Stonciute-Balniene G, Banisauskaite A, Velickiene L, Bumblyte I, Jankauskas A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004881 PMC: 11856860. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041349.


Potential of quantitative T1 mapping to serve as a novel prognostic predictor of clear cell renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy.

Zhong L, Wang R, Tang Q, Huang S, Dai C, Ding Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(10):7600-7611.

PMID: 39429588 PMC: 11485360. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1829.


A Non-Invasive Technique to Unveil Renal Implications in Anderson-Fabry Disease.

Gravina M, Troise D, Infante B, Tartaglia L, Minopoli B, Allegra C Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335464 PMC: 11428866. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12091950.


Native T mapping-based radiomics diagnosis of kidney function and renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease.

Wei C, Jin Z, Ma Q, Xu Y, Zhu Y, Zeng Y iScience. 2024; 27(8):110493.

PMID: 39175777 PMC: 11339247. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110493.


Noninvasive diagnosis of interstitial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wan S, Wang S, He X, Song C, Wang J Ren Fail. 2024; 46(2):2367021.

PMID: 38938187 PMC: 11216256. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2367021.

References
1.
Messroghli D, Moon J, Ferreira V, Grosse-Wortmann L, He T, Kellman P . Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular.... J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19(1):75. PMC: 5633041. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8. View

2.
Li J, An C, Kang L, Mitch W, Wang Y . Recent Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Renal Fibrosis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017; 24(3):150-153. PMC: 5433256. DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2017.03.005. View

3.
Sigmund E, Vivier P, Sui D, Lamparello N, Tantillo K, Mikheev A . Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration and furosemide flow challenges. Radiology. 2012; 263(3):758-69. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111327. View

4.
Dekkers I, Paiman E, de Vries A, Lamb H . Reproducibility of native T mapping for renal tissue characterization at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018; 49(2):588-596. PMC: 6585932. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26207. View

5.
Wolf M, de Boer A, Sharma K, Boor P, Leiner T, Sunder-Plassmann G . Magnetic resonance imaging T1- and T2-mapping to assess renal structure and function: a systematic review and statement paper. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33(suppl_2):ii41-ii50. PMC: 6106643. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy198. View