» Articles » PMID: 37578091

Self-Relevance Predicts the Aesthetic Appeal of Real and Synthetic Artworks Generated Via Neural Style Transfer

Overview
Journal Psychol Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Aug 14
PMID 37578091
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

What determines the aesthetic appeal of artworks? Recent work suggests that aesthetic appeal can, to some extent, be predicted from a visual artwork's image features. Yet a large fraction of variance in aesthetic ratings remains unexplained and may relate to individual preferences. We hypothesized that an artwork's aesthetic appeal depends strongly on self-relevance. In a first study ( = 33 adults, online replication = 208), rated aesthetic appeal for real artworks was positively predicted by rated self-relevance. In a second experiment ( = 45 online), we created synthetic, self-relevant artworks using deep neural networks that transferred the style of existing artworks to photographs. Style transfer was applied to self-relevant photographs selected to reflect participant-specific attributes such as autobiographical memories. Self-relevant, synthetic artworks were rated as more aesthetically appealing than matched control images, at a level similar to human-made artworks. Thus, self-relevance is a key determinant of aesthetic appeal, independent of artistic skill and image features.

Citing Articles

The effect of social factors on eye movements made when judging the aesthetic merit of figurative paintings.

Trawinski T, Palumbo L, Begum R, Donnelly N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21843.

PMID: 39294260 PMC: 11410938. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72810-4.


Self-reference and emotional reaction drive aesthetic judgment.

Salgues S, Jacquot A, Makowski D, Tahar C, Baekeland J, Arcangeli M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19699.

PMID: 39181906 PMC: 11344806. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68331-9.


The perceived beauty of art is not strongly calibrated to the statistical regularities of real-world scenes.

Swartz A, Skelton A, Mather G, Bosten J, Maule J, Franklin A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19368.

PMID: 39169117 PMC: 11339329. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69689-6.


Consensus and contention in beauty judgment.

Pombo M, Igdalova A, Pelli D iScience. 2024; 27(7):110213.

PMID: 39006484 PMC: 11245996. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110213.


Genetic effects on variability in visual aesthetic evaluations are partially shared across visual domains.

Bignardi G, Smit D, Vessel E, Trupp M, Ticini L, Fisher S Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):55.

PMID: 38184755 PMC: 10771521. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05710-4.


References
1.
Rogers T, Kuiper N, Kirker W . Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977; 35(9):677-88. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.35.9.677. View

2.
Sarasso P, Neppi-Modona M, Rosaia N, Perna P, Barbieri P, Del Fante E . Nice and easy: Mismatch negativity responses reveal a significant correlation between aesthetic appreciation and perceptual learning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021; 151(6):1433-1445. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001149. View

3.
Palmer S, Schloss K . An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(19):8877-82. PMC: 2889342. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906172107. View

4.
Redies C, Grebenkina M, Mohseni M, Kaduhm A, Dobel C . Global Image Properties Predict Ratings of Affective Pictures. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:953. PMC: 7235378. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00953. View

5.
Cheung V, Harrison P, Meyer L, Pearce M, Haynes J, Koelsch S . Uncertainty and Surprise Jointly Predict Musical Pleasure and Amygdala, Hippocampus, and Auditory Cortex Activity. Curr Biol. 2019; 29(23):4084-4092.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.067. View