» Articles » PMID: 37577258

Using Reappraisal to Improve Outcomes for STEM Teachers and Students

Overview
Journal J Cogn
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Aug 14
PMID 37577258
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The many stressors associated with teaching can take a toll, resulting in high levels of burnout among teachers and reduced motivation and academic performance among students. This is especially true in the context of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects. Despite the efficacy of emotion regulation interventions in pedagogical settings in general and in STEM teaching in particular, there is a lack of suitable interventions. We applied the process model of emotion regulation to STEM teaching and proposed a framework, STEM-Model of EmotioN regulation: Teachers' Opportunities and Responsibilities (STEM-MENTOR), to elucidate how the high demands of STEM teaching and contextual factors (e.g., culture, reforms, teacher-student interactions) may lead to intensified negative emotions and deficits in executive functioning and emotion regulation implementation. Teacher emotions, in turn, shape students' STEM-related achievements and epistemic emotions. Thus, teachers' emotion regulation skills have pervasive effects on teaching outcomes for both teachers and students. We illustrate how at each level of our framework, steps could be taken to improve teachers' emotional trajectory. Our proposed STEM-MENTOR framework has implications for theoretical understanding and may help to shape future interventions that focus on cognitive-emotional processes in STEM education.

Citing Articles

Teachers' Attitudes Towards STEM Education: Exploring the Role of Their Readiness via a Structural Equation Model.

Papagiannopoulou T, Vaiopoulou J Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024; 14(11):2850-2864.

PMID: 39590024 PMC: 11593107. DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe14110187.

References
1.
Mesquita B . Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 80(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.68. View

2.
Dorman Ilan S, Tamuz N, Sheppes G . The fit between emotion regulation choice and individual resources is associated with adaptive functioning among young children. Cogn Emot. 2018; 33(3):597-605. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1470494. View

3.
Malmberg L, Hagger H . Changes in student teachers' agency beliefs during a teacher education year, and relationships with observed classroom quality, and day-to-day experiences. Br J Educ Psychol. 2009; 79(Pt 4):677-94. DOI: 10.1348/000709909X454814. View

4.
Shields G, Sazma M, Yonelinas A . The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: A meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 68:651-668. PMC: 5003767. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038. View

5.
Banich M, Mackiewicz K, Depue B, Whitmer A, Miller G, Heller W . Cognitive control mechanisms, emotion and memory: a neural perspective with implications for psychopathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 33(5):613-30. PMC: 2865433. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.010. View