Socioeconomic Inequalities in Alcohol-related Harm in Adolescents: a Prospective Cohort Study of 68,299 Danish 15-19-year-olds

Overview

Journal EClinicalMedicine

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Aug 14

PMID 37576460

Authors

Janne S Tolstrup

Sofie Kruckow

Ulrik Becker

Ove Andersen

Susan M Sawyer

Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi

Sanne Pagh Moller

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Evidence shows that similar levels of alcohol consumption lead to greater harm in adults with low socioeconomic position (SEP) compared to high SEP. We investigated if SEP is associated with alcohol-related hospital contacts in adolescents, and whether differences in risk can be explained by differences in levels of alcohol consumption, drinking pattern, and substance use.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 68,299 participants aged 15-19 years old from the Danish National Youth Cohort 2014. SEP was operationalised as parent educational level, family income and perceived financial strain in the family. Data were linked to national registers and participants were followed up for five years from 2014 to 2019. Outcomes were hospital contacts due to alcohol. Multilevel Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR).

Findings: During 280,010 person years of follow-up, 872 participants had an alcohol-attributable hospital contact; intoxications (n = 778, 89%) were the most common diagnosis. Low as compared to high SEP was associated with higher IRR of alcohol-attributable hospital contacts for all three SEP measures. The adjusted IRR of harm was 1.73 (95% CI: 1.29-2.33) for elementary school as the highest parent education compared to longer parent education and 1.57 (95% CI: 1.30-1.89) for family financial strain compared to those without financial strain. Adjustment for weekly alcohol intake, drinking pattern and substance use did not substantially change results. Cubic spline analysis of the association between family income and alcohol-attributable hospital contacts revealed a dose-response relationship with decreasing risk of alcohol-related harm with higher income.

Interpretation: Our findings suggested that alcohol-related harm is more common in socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents despite similar levels of alcohol consumption, regardless of differences in drinking pattern or substance use. Future preventive strategies should prioritise young adolescents, including those who are most disadvantaged.

Funding: Tryg Foundation (ID: 153539).

Citing Articles

The alcohol harm paradox: is it valid for self-reported alcohol harms and does hazardous drinking pattern matter?.

Rossow I, Bye E BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3053.

PMID: 39501200 PMC: 11539690. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20530-9.

All cause and cause specific mortality in 15-24-year-olds in Denmark 2010 to 2022: nationwide study of socioeconomic predictors.

Kruckow S, Tolstrup J BMJ Med. 2024; 3(1):e000685.

PMID: 39175917 PMC: 11340248. DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000685.

Socioeconomic disparities in alcohol-related depression: a national cohort study of low-income medical aid beneficiaries and national health insurance beneficiaries in Korea.

Lee S, Kwon Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2189.

PMID: 39134957 PMC: 11321173. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19665-6.

References

Sadler S, Angus C, Gavens L, Gillespie D, Holmes J, Hamilton J . Understanding the alcohol harm paradox: an analysis of sex- and condition-specific hospital admissions by socio-economic group for alcohol-associated conditions in England. Addiction. 2016; 112(5):808-817. DOI: 10.1111/add.13726. View

Beard E, Brown J, West R, Angus C, Brennan A, Holmes J . Deconstructing the Alcohol Harm Paradox: A Population Based Survey of Adults in England. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0160666. PMC: 5040414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160666. View

Katikireddi S, Whitley E, Lewsey J, Gray L, Leyland A . Socioeconomic status as an effect modifier of alcohol consumption and harm: analysis of linked cohort data. Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2(6):e267-e276. PMC: 5463030. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30078-6. View

Devaux M, Sassi F . Social disparities in hazardous alcohol use: self-report bias may lead to incorrect estimates. Eur J Public Health. 2015; 26(1):129-34. PMC: 4851717. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv190. View

Conger R, Conger K, Elder Jr G, Lorenz F, Simons R, Whitbeck L . A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Dev. 1992; 63(3):526-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01644.x. View

Makela P, Paljarvi T . Do consequences of a given pattern of drinking vary by socioeconomic status? A mortality and hospitalisation follow-up for alcohol-related causes of the Finnish Drinking Habits Surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62(8):728-33. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2007.065672. View

Boyd J, Sexton O, Angus C, Meier P, Purshouse R, Holmes J . Causal mechanisms proposed for the alcohol harm paradox-a systematic review. Addiction. 2021; 117(1):33-56. PMC: 8595457. DOI: 10.1111/add.15567. View

Bloomfield K . Understanding the alcohol-harm paradox: what next?. Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5(6):e300-e301. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30119-5. View

Thor S, Karlsson P, Landberg J . Social Inequalities in Harmful Drinking and Alcohol-Related Problems Among Swedish Adolescents. Alcohol Alcohol. 2019; 54(5):532-539. PMC: 7011164. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agz044. View

10.

Gore F, Bloem P, Patton G, Ferguson J, Joseph V, Coffey C . Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011; 377(9783):2093-102. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60512-6. View

11.

Boyd J, Bambra C, Purshouse R, Holmes J . Beyond Behaviour: How Health Inequality Theory Can Enhance Our Understanding of the 'Alcohol-Harm Paradox'. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11). PMC: 8199939. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18116025. View

12.

Pena S, Makela P, Laatikainen T, Harkanen T, Mannisto S, Heliovaara M . Joint effects of alcohol use, smoking and body mass index as an explanation for the alcohol harm paradox: causal mediation analysis of eight cohort studies. Addiction. 2021; 116(8):2220-2230. DOI: 10.1111/add.15395. View

13.

Linakis J, Chun T, Mello M, Baird J . Alcohol-related visits to the emergency department by injured adolescents: a national perspective. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45(1):84-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.11.008. View

14.

Rhew I, Duckworth J, Hurvitz P, Lee C . Within- and between-person associations of neighborhood poverty with alcohol use and consequences: A monthly study of young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 212:108068. PMC: 7340513. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108068. View

15.

Squeglia L, Tapert S, Sullivan E, Jacobus J, Meloy M, Rohlfing T . Brain development in heavy-drinking adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 2015; 172(6):531-42. PMC: 4451385. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14101249. View

16.

Galobardes B, Lynch J, Davey Smith G . Measuring socioeconomic position in health research. Br Med Bull. 2007; 81-82:21-37. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldm001. View

17.

Pisinger V, Mikkelsen S, Bendtsen P, Egan K, Tolstrup J . The Danish National Youth Study 2014: Study design, population characteristics and non-response analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2017; 48(2):224-232. DOI: 10.1177/1403494817729283. View

18.

Greenland S . Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology. 1995; 6(4):356-65. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199507000-00005. View

19.

Diderichsen F, Hallqvist J, Whitehead M . Differential vulnerability and susceptibility: how to make use of recent development in our understanding of mediation and interaction to tackle health inequalities. Int J Epidemiol. 2018; 48(1):268-274. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy167. View

20.

Pena S, Makela P, Harkanen T, Heliovaara M, Gunnar T, Mannisto S . Measurement error as an explanation for the alcohol harm paradox: analysis of eight cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 49(6):1836-1846. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa113. View