» Articles » PMID: 37576250

Root Growth and Physiological Responses in Wheat to Topsoil and Subsoil Compaction with or Without Artificial Vertical Macropores

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Aug 14
PMID 37576250
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The process of soil compaction can cause various stresses on roots, ultimately limiting their growth and development within the soil. Understanding this phenomenon in real-world conditions can be challenging since the growth of roots is influenced by the soil environment. To investigate this issue, four experiments were conducted to examine the impact of topsoil (two in pots: with clay loam and sandy loam soils under two soil water regimes) and subsoil (in rhizobox: one with clay loam soil and the other with sandy loam soil, containing artificial vertical macropores) compaction on the relationship between edaphic factors and the physiological response of wheat roots. The topsoil compaction reduced root length, volume, and weight by 30-50% and the root diameter by ∼15% compared to the non-compact soil. The effect was reduced in the soil with higher clay content (clay loam), especially under the limited soil water condition. Plant physiological responses were adversely affected by compaction with a reduction in plant height. The transpiration rate was highly impacted (21-47% reduction) with the build-up of intercellular CO content in leaves (13-31%), especially with limited water applications. Root growth was severely restricted (>60%) in the compact subsoil layer, although the surface area and volume of roots increased in the overlying non-compact layer. Naturally occurring or artificial vertical macropores acted as escape channels, facilitating the roots to pass through the compact subsoil and grow abundantly in the loose soil below. However, plants in field conditions encounter a mix of loose and compact soil zones. By studying how roots respond to this soil heterogeneity, we can develop strategies to reduce the negative effects of soil compaction.

Citing Articles

Growth, Biochemical Traits, Antioxidant Enzymes, and Essential Oils of Four Aromatic and Medicinal Plants Cultivated in Phosphate-Mine Residues.

Ait Elallem K, Bakrim W, Yasri A, Boularbah A Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39339631 PMC: 11435175. DOI: 10.3390/plants13182656.

References
1.
Pfeifer J, Faget M, Walter A, Blossfeld S, Fiorani F, Schurr U . Spring barley shows dynamic compensatory root and shoot growth responses when exposed to localised soil compaction and fertilisation. Funct Plant Biol. 2020; 41(6):581-597. DOI: 10.1071/FP13224. View

2.
Colombi T, Braun S, Keller T, Walter A . Artificial macropores attract crop roots and enhance plant productivity on compacted soils. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 574:1283-1293. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.194. View

3.
Montagu K, Conroy J, Atwell B . The position of localized soil compaction determines root and subsequent shoot growth responses. J Exp Bot. 2001; 52(364):2127-33. DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/52.364.2127. View

4.
Thalmann M, Santelia D . Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress. New Phytol. 2017; 214(3):943-951. DOI: 10.1111/nph.14491. View

5.
Colombi T, Walter A . Root responses of triticale and soybean to soil compaction in the field are reproducible under controlled conditions. Funct Plant Biol. 2020; 43(2):114-128. DOI: 10.1071/FP15194. View