» Articles » PMID: 37575279

A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting Vs Crown Thickness

Overview
Journal Int J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Aug 14
PMID 37575279
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Er:YAG laser is widely used in debonding of all-ceramic veneers nowadays. However, the data about laser parameters in all-ceramic crown removal is limited. The aim of this preliminary study was to determine the most appropriate laser parameters at safe heat transmission values ​​for lithium disilicate crowns in different thicknesses. Twenty-seven intact premolars were prepared to fabricate lithium disilicate CAD/CAM full-coverage crowns in three different thicknesses: 1, 1.5 mm, and mixed thickness (n=9). Each thickness group was divided into 3 subgroups and subjected to Er:YAG laser at different wattages (5, 5.6 and 5.9 W) to determine the appropriate wattage for each thickness. The removal time and temperature rise values were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to evaluate any significant differences in removal time, Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, and the Pearson chi-square test for temperature rise over the critical value (<0.05). Laser irradiation at 5 W was safe and efficient for 1 mm thickness, while not efficient for others. Laser application at 5.9 W was efficient for all thicknesses, but, not safe for 1 mm thickness. The statistically significant difference in removal time was only between 5 W and 5.9 W groups (=0.035). Pearson's chi-square test revealed that the temperature rise after 5.9 W laser application was significantly different from 5 W in 1 mm thickness group (=0.043). Er:YAG laser lithium disilicate crown removal is an effective and safe method using laser settings appropriate for crown thickness.

Citing Articles

Optimized Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Parameters for the Removal of Dental Ceramic Restorations.

Laky M, Toth P, Laky B, Vaskovich T, Kurzmann C, Arslan M Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(17).

PMID: 37687528 PMC: 10488396. DOI: 10.3390/ma16175835.

References
1.
Oztoprak M, Tozlu M, Iseri U, Ulkur F, Arun T . Effects of different application durations of scanning laser method on debonding strength of laminate veneers. Lasers Med Sci. 2011; 27(4):713-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-011-0959-1. View

2.
Deeb J, Crowell A, Richey K, Bencharit S, Carrico C, Williams T . In Vitro Study of Laser-Assisted Prefabricated Ceramic Crown Debonding as Compared to Traditional Rotary Instrument Removal. Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(10). PMC: 9143968. DOI: 10.3390/ma15103617. View

3.
Rechmann P, Buu N, Rechmann B, Finzen F . Laser all-ceramic crown removal-a laboratory proof-of-principle study-phase 2 crown debonding time. Lasers Surg Med. 2014; 46(8):636-43. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22280. View

4.
Conrad H, Seong W, Pesun I . Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(5):389-404. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3. View

5.
Tocchio R, Williams P, Mayer F, Standing K . Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 103(2):155-62. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81765-2. View